Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Alternatives to unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation in cardiopulmonary bypass.

Review published in Perfusion (2001)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewEnsayos clínicosDesarrollo de fármacosvon Segesser et al. · Perfusion, 2001

Abstract

Despite the progress made in the development of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) equipment, systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and post-bypass neutralization with protamine are still used in most perfusion procedures. However, there are a number of situations where unfractionated heparin, protamine or both cannot be used for various reasons. Intolerance of protamine can be addressed with extracorporeal heparin removal devices, perfusion with (no) low systemic heparinization and, to some degree, by perfusion with alternative anticoagulants. Various alternative anticoagulation regimens have been used in cases of intolerance to unfractionated heparin, including extreme hemodilution, low molecular weight heparins, danaparoid, ancrod, r-hirudin, abciximab, tirofiban, argatroban and others. In the presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis, the use of r-hirudin appears to be an acceptable solution which has been well studied. The main issue with r-hirudin is the difficulty in monitoring its activity during CPB, despite the fact that ecarin coagulation time assessment is now available. A more recent approach is based on selective blockage of platelet aggregation by means of monoclonal antibodies directed to GPIIb/IIIa receptors (abciximab) or the use of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban). An 80% blockage of the GPIIb/IIIa receptors and suppression of platelet aggregation to less than 20% allows the giving of unfractionated heparin and running CPB in a standard fashion despite HIT and thrombosis. Likewise, at the end of the procedure, unfractionated heparin is neutralized with protamine as usual and donor platelets are transfused if necessary. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors are frequently used in interventional cardiology and, therefore, are available in most hospitals.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAbciximabAncrodAntibodies, MonoclonalAnticoagulantsArginineCardiopulmonary BypassChondroitin SulfatesCross ReactionsDermatan SulfateDrug CombinationsDrug HypersensitivityFactor Xa Inhibitors

Resumen

Despite the progress made in the development of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) equipment, systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and post-bypass neutralization with protamine are still used in most perfusion procedures. However, there are a number of situations where unfractionated...

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This review evaluates alternative anticoagulation strategies for cardiopulmonary bypass in patients unable to receive unfractionated heparin or protamine neutralization. The abstract identifies r-hirudin as a well-studied and acceptable anticoagulant option in cases complicated by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis, while noting that difficulty in monitoring its activity during bypass remains a key limitation. For ASH's domain, the inclusion of r-hirudin among clinically utilized anticoagulants is notable. However, the article addresses systemic pharmacological agents only and provides no discussion of hirudotherapy, live leeches, or the broader leech secretome; the abstract does not state the biological origin of r-hirudin.

Citación

Alternatives to unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation in cardiopulmonary bypass.

von Segesser et al. · Perfusion, 2001

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.