Real-world evidence comparing oral anticoagulants for NVAF in Europe: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Research article published in Future cardiology (2025)
Abstract
AIM: Atrial fibrillation is the most commonly sustained cardiac arrhythmia, increasing the risk of stroke and systemic embolic events. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare real-world evidence (RWE) on the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban with other direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Europe. MATERIALS & METHODS: Searches from January 2013 to December 2022 identified comparative observational studies assessing effectiveness/safety outcomes in patients with NVAF. Bayesian NMA estimated comparative effectiveness/safety of edoxaban with other DOACs and VKAs. RESULTS: The review identified 57 studies analyzing data from 24 unique databases; 33 studies were included in the base-case analyses. DOACs showed benefit over VKAs for most outcomes, of which major bleeding and all-cause mortality were most commonly reported. Edoxaban demonstrated a comparable effectiveness/safety profile to other DOACs and significantly reduced risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [95% credible interval]: 0.67 [0.54, 0.84]) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.69 [0.51, 0.94]) versus rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: This NMA provides valuable insights into the real-world effectiveness and safety of DOACs and VKAs in Europe, supporting clinical decision-making and adding to the existing evidence base from clinical trials. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart problem that can cause strokes and blood clots. This study looked at how well and how safely the blood thinner edoxaban works compared to other blood thinners and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in people with AF living in Europe. Researchers reviewed studies from 2013 to 2022 and included European studies that compared these blood thinners in people with AF. They used an analytical method to estimate statistical comparisons of effectiveness and safety between treatments. A total of 57 studies were identified and 33 were included in the analysis. The results showed that most newer blood thinners (direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) were better than VKAs for preventing serious bleeding events and death. Edoxaban was found to be as effective and safe as other newer blood thinners and had a lower risk of major bleeding and bleeding in the brain compared with rivaroxaban. This study gives useful information about the real-world use of these blood thinners in Europe, which helps doctors make better treatment choices for their patients.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de redes bayesianas agrupó 57 estudios observacionales europeos de la vida real (33 en el caso base, extraídos de 24 bases de datos) sobre anticoagulantes para fibrilación auricular no valvular, encontrando que los anticoagulantes orales directos (DOACs) generalmente superaron a los antagonistas de la vitamina K para resultados como la hemorragia mayor y la mortalidad por todas las causas, y que el edoxabán mostró un perfil comparable al de otros DOACs mientras reducía significativamente la hemorragia mayor (HR 0.67 [0.54-0.84]) y la hemorragia intracraneal (0.69 [0.51-0.94]) frente al rivaroxabán. Para la hirudoterapia, esto mapea el campo moderno de anticoagulación sistémica contra el cual los componentes antitrombóticos del secretoma de la lombriz medicinal están conceptualmente posicionados, subrayando que la reducción del riesgo de sangrado sigue siendo un objetivo clínico central. Como una comparación indirecta construida sobre datos observacionales en lugar de datos aleatorizados, el metaanálisis de redes está sujeto a confusión y heterogeneidad de bases de datos, y no estudia la terapia con lombrices.
Citación
Real-world evidence comparing oral anticoagulants for NVAF in Europe: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Cichewicz et al. · Future cardiology, 2025
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 29, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026