Rivaroxaban for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism
Research article published in Science progress (2021)
Abstract
All cancers can increase the risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), and anticoagulants should be considered as an optimal treatment for patients suffering from cancer-associated VTE. However, there is still a debate about whether the new oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban, can bring better efficacy and safety outcomes globally. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for relevant published papers before 1 September 2019, with no language restrictions. The primary outcomes are defined as the recurrence of VTE. The secondary outcomes are defined as clinically relevant non-major bleeding, adverse major bleeding events, and all-cause of death. The data were analyzed by Stata with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Four trials encompassing 1996 patients were included. Rivaroxaban reduced recurrent VTE with no significant difference (RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.43-1.07). Similarly, there were no significant differences in adverse major bleeding events (RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.37-2.00), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.73-2.12) and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.40-1.44). In a selected study population of cancer patients with VTE, rivaroxaban is as good as other anticoagulants. Further, carefully designed randomized controlled trials should be performed to confirm these results.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta revisión sistemática y metaanálisis agrupó cuatro ensayos (1996 pacientes) que compararon el anticoagulante oral directo rivaroxaban con otros anticoagulantes para la TVP asociada al cáncer, encontrando diferencias estadísticamente no significativas en la TVP recurrente (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.43-1.07), hemorragia mayor, hemorragia clínica relevante no mayor o mortalidad por todas las causas, y concluyendo que el rivaroxaban es 'tan bueno como' otros agentes en esta población. Para el panorama de evidencia de la ASH, mapea el paisaje farmacológico anticoagulante moderno contra el cual cualquier antitrombótico derivado biológicamente, incluyendo los anticoagulantes del secreto de la lombriz que motivan el interés en el descubrimiento de fármacos de la hirudoterapia, tendría que ser comparado. El estudio examina un fármaco oral de pequeña molécula sintético y no tiene conexión directa con la hirudoterapia; sus propios autores señalan que los ensayos incluidos eran pocos y piden más ensayos controlados aleatorios cuidadosamente diseñados para confirmar los hallazgos.
Citación
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026