Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Impact of anemia on short-term outcomes after TAVR: A subgroup analysis from the BRAVO-3 randomized trial

Randomized controlled trial published in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2021)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialEnsayos clínicosSeguridad y control de infeccionesFarmacología salivalRazuk V et al. · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2021

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prognostic impact of anemia in patients randomized to bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Whether the periprocedural use of bivalirudin as compared with UFH in anemic patients undergoing TAVR has an impact on outcomes remains unknown. METHODS: The BRAVO-3 trial compared the use of bivalirudin versus UFH in 802 high risk patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Patients were stratified according to the presence (defined as hemoglobin levels <13 g/dl in men and <12 g/dl in women) or absence of anemia. The primary outcomes were net adverse cardiac events (NACE; a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or bleeding) and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥3b) at 30 days. RESULTS: Among 798 patients with available baseline hemoglobin levels, 427 (54%) were anemic of whom 221 (52%) received bivalirudin. There were no significant differences in NACE and major bleeding at 30 days between patients with and without anemia, irrespective of the type of anticoagulant used (pinteraction  = 0.71 for NACE, pinteraction  = 1.0 for major bleeding). However, anemic patients had a higher risk of major vascular complications (adjusted OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.42-4.16, p = 0.001), and acute kidney injury (adjusted OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.16-2.59, p = 0.007) compared to non-anemic patients at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Anemia was not associated with a higher risk of NACE or major bleeding at 30 days after TAVR without modification of the treatment effects of periprocedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus UFH.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial
Indexed MeSH termsAnemiaAntithrombinsAortic Valve StenosisFemaleHeparinHumansMaleNitrilesTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment Outcome

Resumen

To determine the prognostic impact of anemia in patients randomized to bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This subgroup analysis of the BRAVO-3 randomized trial (802 patients) examined whether anemia influenced 30-day outcomes in patients receiving bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), finding that anemia did not modify the comparative effects of the two anticoagulants for net adverse cardiac events or major bleeding, though anemic patients had higher risks of vascular complications and acute kidney injury. The abstract does not mention leeches, hirudin, or the origin of bivalirudin; no defensible connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome is stated in this abstract, and its relevance is limited to interventional cardiology outcomes.

Citación

Impact of anemia on short-term outcomes after TAVR: A subgroup analysis from the BRAVO-3 randomized trial

Razuk V et al. · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2021

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.