Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Apixabán frente a ninguna anticoagulación para la prevención del tromboembolismo venoso en niños con leucemia linfoblástica aguda o linfoma de nuevo diagnóstico (PREVAPIX-ALL): un ensayo de fase 3, abierto, aleatorizado y controlado

Apixaban versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or lymphoma (PREVAPIX-ALL): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado abierto de fase 3 en la revista The Lancet. Haematology (2023)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de la evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidencia: Ensayo controlado aleatorizadoLiteratura clínicaDesarrollo de fármacosO'Brien et al. · The Lancet. Haematology, 2024

Resumen

BACKGROUND: Paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or lymphoma are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism resulting in increased mortality and morbidity. We hypothesised that apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, would safely reduce venous thromboembolism in this patient population. METHODS: PREVAPIX-ALL was a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial conducted in 74 paediatric hospitals in 9 countries. Participants aged 1 year or older to younger than 18 years with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (pre-B cell or T cell) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (B cell or T cell immunophenotype) and a central venous line in place throughout induction were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard of care (SOC, ie, no systemic anticoagulation) or weight-adjusted twice-daily apixaban during induction. Randomisation was performed centrally and stratified by age (those <10 years or those ≥10 years). Participants weighing 35 kg or less were administered 2·5 mg twice daily of apixaban as a 2·5 mg tablet, 0·5 mg tablets, or 0·4 mg/mL oral solution, while those weighing more than 35 kg were administered weight-adjusted prophylactic doses using 0·5 mg tablets or the 0·4 mg/mL oral solution twice daily. Primary outcomes were assessed by a blinded central adjudication committee. The primary efficacy outcome for the intention to treat population was the composite of symptomatic or clinically unsuspected venous thromboembolism, the primary safety outcome was major bleeding, and secondary safety outcomes included clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. Patients were screened for venous thromboembolism by ultrasound and echocardiogram at the end of induction. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02369653) and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 22, 2015, and June 4, 2021, 512 participants were randomly assigned and included in analyses (222 [43%] female and 290 [57%] male; 388 [76%] White, 52 [10%] Asian, 24 [5%] Black or African American, and 48 [9%] other races; and 122 [24%] Hispanic or Latino ethnicity). During a median follow-up period of 27 days (IQR 26-28), 31 (12%) of 256 patients on apixaban had a composite venous thromboembolism compared with 45 (18%) of 256 participants receiving SOC (relative risk [RR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·45-1·05; p=0·080). Two major bleeding events occurred in each group (RR 1·0, 95% CI 0·14-7·01; p=1·0). A higher incidence of CRNM bleeding, primarily grade 1 or 2 epistaxis, occurred in the apixaban group (11 [4%] of 256 participants) compared with the SOC group (3 [1%] of 256; RR 3·67, 95% CI 1·04-12·97, p=0·030). The most frequent grade 3-5 adverse events in both groups were thrombocytopenia (n=28 for the apixaban group and n=20 for the SOC group) or platelet count decreased (n=49 and n=45), anaemia (n=77 and n=74), febrile neutropenia (n=27 and n=20), and neutropenia (n=16 and n=17) or neutrophil count decreased (n=22 and n=25). Five deaths occurred, which were due to infection (n=3 in the SOC group), cardiac arrest (n=1 in apixaban group), and haemorrhagic cerebral sinus vein thrombosis (n=1 in the SOC group). There was one apixaban-related death (coagulopathy and haemorrhage after cardiac arrest of unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: PREVAPIX-ALL is, to our knowledge, the first trial assessing primary thromboprophylaxis using a direct oral anticoagulant in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or lymphoma. No statistically significant treatment benefit was identified in participants receiving apixaban. Major and CRNM bleeding were infrequent overall, but a higher incidence of CRNM bleeding (primarily epistaxis in younger children) occurred in participants receiving apixaban. For patients deemed to be at particularly high risk of thrombosis, PREVAPIX-ALL provides encouraging safety data for the use of apixaban in clinical settings in which the potential benefits are thought to outweigh the risk of bleeding. FUNDING: Bristol Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance.

Resumen tomado de PubMed (NCBI) para el registro citado, en el idioma original. La versión de referencia es la de la publicación original.

El resumen se deja sin traducir para conservar la redacción original de los autores.

Tipo de publicaciónRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIJournal Article
Términos MeSH indexadosHumansMaleFemaleChildAnticoagulantsVenous ThromboembolismEpistaxisPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaThrombosisLymphomaHeart ArrestTreatment OutcomePyrazolesPyridones

Síntesis

En el ensayo abierto de fase 3 PREVAPIX-ALL, 512 niños con leucemia linfoblástica aguda o linfoma de nuevo diagnóstico se aleatorizaron a apixabán o a ninguna anticoagulación. La tromboembolia venosa ocurrió en el 12 % con apixabán y el 18 % sin anticoagulación (RR 0,69; p = 0,080). Las hemorragias mayores fueron infrecuentes; las clínicamente relevantes no mayores, más frecuentes con apixabán (11 [4 %] frente a 3 [1 %]; p = 0,030). Los autores no hallaron beneficio significativo.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este ensayo aleatorizado de fase 3 evaluó la eficacia y la seguridad del anticoagulante oral directo apixaban versus el estándar de atención para prevenir el tromboembolismo venoso en pacientes pediátricos con leucemia linfoblástica aguda o linfoma. El estudio proporciona datos clínicos valiosos sobre el delicado equilibrio entre la prevención de la trombosis y la evitación de complicaciones hemorrágicas, un desafío hemostático central para la comprensión más amplia de la anticoagulación sistémica que se paralela con las propiedades anticoagulantes localizadas de los compuestos salivales de la sanguijuela, como la hirudina. Sin embargo, la relevancia para la hirudoterapia es estrictamente indirecta; este ensayo farmacéutico no involucra sanguijuelas, extractos de sanguijuela ni componentes del secretoma.

Compuestos relacionados del registro de la ASH

Fármacos sintéticos relacionados con el tema de este artículo. Actúan sobre las mismas dianas que las moléculas de la sanguijuela, pero no se derivan de la sanguijuela:

Citación

Referencia (estilo Vancouver)

O'Brien SH, Rodriguez V, Lew G, Newburger JW, Schultz CL, Orgel E, et al. Apixaban versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or lymphoma (PREVAPIX-ALL): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2024;11(1):e27-e37. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00314-9. PMID: 37980924

Los datos bibliográficos (autores, volumen, páginas, DOI) proceden del registro de PubMed.

Contexto clínico relacionado

Investigación relacionada

Más estudios revisados por pares en la categoría «Literatura clínica».

Ver toda la investigación analizada por la ASH →

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: 28 de mayo de 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.