Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Impact of pre-PCI activated clotting time on outcomes of bivalirudin versus heparin during primary PCI

Pre-specified analysis published in J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv (2025)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosLiu et al. · Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The BRIGHT-4 trial demonstrated that procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin followed by a median 3-hour high-dose infusion reduced the 30-day composite of all-cause mortality or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3 to 5 bleeding compared with heparin alone among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether the pre-PCI activated clotting time (ACT) influences this benefit is unknown. In the study, we aim to investigate whether the pre-PCI ACT levels affected the outcomes with each anticoagulant. METHODS: The BRIGHT-4 protocol required a pre-PCI ACT to be assessed 5 minutes after study medications were administered with additional anticoagulant boluses given to achieve an ACT ≥225 seconds. In the present prespecified analysis, 30-day outcomes were analyzed according to the initial pre-PCI ACT level. RESULTS: The initial pre-PCI ACT was <225 seconds in 971 of 5461 (17.8%) patients, including 123 of 2776 (4.4%) after bivalirudin and 848 of 2685 (31.6%) after heparin (P < .0001). Among 4490 of 5461 (82.2%) patients with an initial ACT ≥225 seconds, bivalirudin was associated with a lower incidence of BARC types 3 to 5 bleeding (0.2% vs 0.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.62; P = .004) and stent thrombosis (0.4% vs 1.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.81; P = .01) compared with heparin. Outcomes were not significantly different in bivalirudin and heparin-treated patients with an initial pre-PCI ACT <225 seconds. There were no significant interactions present between pre-PCI ACT strata and the treatment group for the primary end point or any of the secondary end points. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PCI with radial artery access, procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin was associated with lower 30-day rates of mortality, BARC types 3 to 5 bleeding, and stent thrombosis compared with heparin, findings that were consistent regardless of the pre-PCI ACT level.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Resumen

Pre-specified analysis of pre-PCI activated clotting time impact on bivalirudin-vs-heparin outcomes during primary PCI.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This prespecified analysis of the BRIGHT-4 trial examined whether pre-PCI activated clotting time (ACT) influenced outcomes with bivalirudin versus heparin in 5,461 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, finding that bivalirudin was associated with lower 30-day rates of BARC 3–5 bleeding and stent thrombosis, with consistent findings regardless of ACT level. For ASH, the abstract does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, hirudin, or the leech secretome; the study is solely about pharmaceutical anticoagulation in interventional cardiology. No defensible connection to ASH's domain exists in this abstract—any relevance to leech-derived therapeutics would require external pharmacological knowledge not present in the article.

Citación

Impact of pre-PCI activated clotting time on outcomes of bivalirudin versus heparin during primary PCI.

Liu et al. · Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025

Contexto clínico relacionado

Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.