Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Dabigatran versus vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: final outcomes from Phase III of the GLORIA-AF registry.

Research article published in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society (2022)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportEnsayos clínicosHuisman et al. · Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prospectively collected, routine clinical practice-based data on antithrombotic therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients are important for assessing real-world comparative outcomes. The objective was to compare the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with newly diagnosed AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: GLORIA-AF is a large, prospective, global registry program. Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF and CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥ 1 were included and followed for 3 years. To control for differences in patient characteristics, the comparative analysis for dabigatran versus VKA was performed on a propensity score (PS)-matched patient set. Missing data were multiply imputed. Proportional-hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest. Between 2014 and 2016, 21,300 eligible patients were included worldwide: 3839 patients were prescribed dabigatran and 4836 VKA with a median age of 71.0 and 72.0 years, respectively; > 85% in each group had a CHA2DS2-VASc-score ≥ 2. The PS-matched comparative analysis for dabigatran and VKA included on average 3326 pairs of matched initiators. For dabigatran versus VKAs, adjusted HRs (95% confidence intervals) were: stroke 0.89 (0.59-1.34), major bleeding 0.61 (0.42-0.88), all-cause death 0.78 (0.63-0.97), and myocardial infarction 0.89 (0.53-1.48). Further analyses stratified by PS and region provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran was associated with a 39% reduced risk of major bleeding and 22% reduced risk for all-cause death compared with VKA. Stroke and myocardial infarction risks were similar, confirming a more favorable benefit-risk profile for dabigatran compared with VKA in clinical practice. Clinical trial registration https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov . NCT01468701, NCT01671007.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAdministration, OralAgedAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDabigatranFibrinolytic AgentsHemorrhageHumansMyocardial InfarctionProspective StudiesRegistries

Resumen

Dabigatran versus vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: final outcomes from Phase III of the GLORIA-AF registry.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Utilizando el gran registro prospectivo GLORIA-AF con emparejamiento por puntaje de propensidad, este análisis de la vida real de pacientes con fibrilación auricular recién diagnosticada informó que dabigatran se asoció con un riesgo 39% menor de sangrado mayor (HR 0,61, IC del 95% 0,42-0,88) y un riesgo 22% menor de muerte por todas las causas (HR 0,78, IC del 95% 0,63-0,97) versus antagonistas de la vitamina K, con riesgo similar de ictus e infarto de miocardio. El vínculo de la hirudoterapia es mecanístico: dabigatran es un inhibidor directo de la trombina sintético, el mismo objetivo molecular que la hirudina derivada de lombrices bloquea, por lo que este registro ayuda a consolidar la credibilidad clínica de la inhibición directa de la trombina como una estrategia anticoagulante que el secreto de la lombriz encarna en forma natural. Nota honesta: esto son datos de registro observacionales, no un ensayo aleatorio, y evalúa un fármaco de pequeña molécula oral, no la terapia de lombrices; el mecanismo compartido de inhibición de la trombina es una analogía, no evidencia sobre la hirudoterapia en sí.

Citación

Dabigatran versus vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: final outcomes from Phase III of the GLORIA-AF registry.

Huisman et al. · Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2022

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.