Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Heparin and bivalirudin in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome

Review published in Cardiovasc Ther (2024)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Systematic reviewDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosWang et al. · Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2024

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is one of the most common leading global causes of mortality, encompassing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina (UA). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a pivotal therapeutic approach for ACS, underscoring the importance of anticoagulation strategies. Among the commonly employed anticoagulants in PCI, heparin and bivalirudin take precedence, with heparin serving as the archetypal choice. Nevertheless, the determination of an optimal anticoagulation regimen remains a point of contention in contemporary clinical practice. To address the differences in anticoagulants during PCI, we meticulously conducted a literature review through PubMed and Web of Science, employing search terms such as "heparin," "bivalirudin," "percutaneous coronary intervention," and "acute coronary syndrome." For patients with PIC brought on by STEMI, NSTEMI, and stable or UA pectoris, the review focused on randomized controlled trials to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of heparin and bivalirudin as anticoagulant options. This systematic review is aimed at furnishing valuable insights into the ongoing debate surrounding the choice of anticoagulation regimens in PCI. By scrutinizing clinical evidence derived from relevant trials, we seek to inform and guide healthcare practitioners in making informed decisions based on the unique requirements of patients with various ACS presentations.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleSystematic Review
Indexed MeSH termsHumansHirudinsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAcute Coronary SyndromeHeparinPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsAnticoagulantsTreatment OutcomeAntithrombinsRisk FactorsHemorrhage

Resumen

Review of heparin and bivalirudin use in PCI for acute coronary syndromes.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This systematic review compares the efficacy and safety of heparin and bivalirudin as anticoagulant options during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome, focusing on randomized controlled trials identified through PubMed and Web of Science. The abstract does not mention leeches, hirudin, the leech secretome, or any connection to leech-derived therapeutics. CAVEAT: This article has no defensible relevance to hirudotherapy or ASH's domain based on its abstract; no outcome data are reported, and no link to the leech secretome is discussed in the source text.

Citación

Heparin and bivalirudin in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome.

Wang et al. · Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2024

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.