A Systematic Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine: "Miscellaneous Therapies"
Review published in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI (2021)
Abstract
There is an increasing interest in complementary and alternative veterinary medicine (CAVM). There is, however, an uncertainty of the efficacy of these methods. Therefore, the aim of this systematic literature review is to assess the evidence for clinical efficacy of 24 CAVM therapies used in cats, dogs, and horses. A bibliographic search, restricted to studies in cats, dogs, and horses, was performed on Web of Science Core Collection, CABI, and PubMed. Relevant articles were assessed for scientific quality, and information was extracted on study characteristics, species, type of treatment, indication, and treatment effects. Of 982 unique publications screened, 42 were eligible for inclusion, representing nine different CAVM therapies, which were aromatherapy, gold therapy, homeopathy, leeches (hirudotherapy), mesotherapy, mud, neural therapy, sound (music) therapy, and vibration therapy. For 15 predefined therapies, no study was identified. The risk of bias was assessed as high in 17 studies, moderate to high in 10, moderate in 10, low to moderate in four, and low in one study. In those studies where the risk of bias was low to moderate, there was considerable heterogeneity in reported treatment effects. Therefore, the scientific evidence is not strong enough to define the clinical efficacy of the 24 CAVM therapies.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
There is an increasing interest in complementary and alternative veterinary medicine (CAVM).
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta revisión sistemática de la literatura evaluó la evidencia sobre la eficacia clínica de 24 terapias de medicina veterinaria complementaria y alternativa en gatos, perros y caballos; de 982 publicaciones examinadas, 42 fueron elegibles y representaron nueve terapias, incluidas las sanguijuelas (hirudoterapia). El resumen reporta el riesgo de sesgo como alto en 17 estudios, moderado-alto en 10, moderado en 10, bajo-moderado en cuatro y bajo en uno, con heterogeneidad considerable en los efectos del tratamiento entre los estudios con sesgo bajo-moderado. Concluye que la evidencia científica no es lo suficientemente sólida como para definir la eficacia clínica de las 24 terapias. La revisión es relevante porque enumera explícitamente las sanguijuelas/hirudoterapia como modalidad veterinaria, pero el resumen no proporciona ningún hallazgo de eficacia específico para la hirudoterapia ni un veredicto de insuficiencia separado más allá de la conclusión general.
Citación
A Systematic Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine: "Miscellaneous Therapies"
Bergh A et al. · Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026