Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Three end-to-end techniques for microvascular anastomosis of vessels with different size discrepancy

Retrospective study published in Ann Plast Surg (2020)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienZhang Y et al. · Annals of plastic surgery, 2020

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Size discrepancy in microvascular anastomosis is a common issue in free flap transfer and replantation surgery. A number of different techniques have been described to overcome the problem, but optimal method continues to be defined. METHODS: Since June 2015 to May 2018, clinical courses of 103 microvascular cases performed by one senior surgeon were reviewed. Three end-to-end techniques including mechanical dilation, single-mattress suture, and wedge resection were applied in 364 anastomoses with caliber ratio between 1:1 and 1:1.5, 1:1.5 and 1:2, and 1:2 and 1: 3, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 112 flaps were incorporated in this study. The incidence of anastomotic failure was 3.0% (11/364), and the overall flap failure rate was 3.6% (4/112). The failure cases included 2 replanted scalps, 1 replanted ear, and 1 superficial temporal artery flap for nasal reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results depicted operational convenience and reliability of the 3 end-to-end anastomotic techniques in addressing mild-to-large vessel discrepancy.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAnastomosis, SurgicalFree Tissue FlapsHumansMicrosurgeryReproducibility of ResultsSutures

Zusammenfassung

Series of 364 anastomoses using mechanical dilation, single-mattress suture, or wedge resection for varying caliber ratios. 3.0% anastomotic failure, 3.6% flap failure rates across 112 flaps.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This study reviewed 103 microvascular cases (112 flaps, 364 anastomoses) performed by one senior surgeon, comparing three end-to-end anastomotic techniques (mechanical dilation, single-mattress suture, wedge resection) for vessel size discrepancy in free flap transfer and replantation. Overall anastomotic failure was 3.0% and flap failure 3.6%. The relevance to ASH's domain is indirect: the work addresses technical aspects of microvascular surgery in the setting where medicinal leeches are sometimes deployed for postoperative venous congestion, but leeches are not mentioned. No data on hirudotherapy, the secretome, or venous-congestion management are provided. The study is limited to surgical technique outcomes from a single surgeon's experience.

Zitation

Three end-to-end techniques for microvascular anastomosis of vessels with different size discrepancy.

Zhang Y et al. · Annals of plastic surgery, 2020

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.