Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits

Research article published in Journal of hand and microsurgery (2024)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Klinische StudienToshinskiy S, Frees M, Hillard C · Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2024

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Venous congestion is a common phenomenon following digital revascularization and replantation. Leech therapy allows for venous outflow while angiogenesis and neovascularization take place. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of leech therapy in the revascularized and replanted digits and determine risk factors for unsuccessful salvage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients with complete or incomplete digital amputations at an academic Level 1 Trauma Center who underwent digital replantation or revascularization from January 2005 to December 2020. Amputations proximal to the palmar arch as well as revascularizations that showed any degree of perfusion on preoperative assessment were excluded. Leech therapy was initiated as soon as any signs of venous congestion appeared and was titrated to clinical effect. Patient demographics, medical history, injury mechanism, extent and level, operative details, leech therapy details, number of blood transfusions, hospitalization length, as well as the digit's ultimate survival data were collected. RESULTS: Of the 159 patients who underwent 213 digital revascularizations (n ​= ​135) and replantations (n ​= ​78), venous congestion requiring leech therapy developed in 27 digits in the revascularization group and in 26 in the replantation group. Of the digits that were leeched, 15 failed in the revascularization group (56 ​% failure rate) and 17 failed in the replantation group (65 ​% failure rate). Avulsion mechanism of injury and presence of a circumferential laceration were significantly associated with rate of failure in the revascularization cohort (p ​< ​0.01). Proximal level of injury was significantly associated with rate of failure in the replantation group (p ​< ​0.01). CONCLUSION: Leech therapy has limited efficacy in avulsed or more proximally injured digits. These data can aid in determining the prognosis of a digit with venous congestion after revascularization and replantation.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Zusammenfassung

Venous congestion is a common phenomenon following digital revascularization and replantation. Leech therapy allows for venous outflow while angiogenesis and neovascularization take place.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

Contributes clinical evidence for the therapeutic application of leech therapy.

Zitation

Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits.

Toshinskiy S, Frees M, Hillard C · Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2024

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: March 18, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.