Leech therapy for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results and implications of a pilot study
Pilot controlled study published in Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine (2002)
Abstract
CONTEXT: Leech therapy was a mainstay in conventional treatment for pain from antiquity until the mid-19th century. Its use is still widespread in traditional healing procedures in Asia, Africa, and Arabic countries. There is renewed interest in leech therapy in the field of complementary medicine and empirical evidence for specific benefit in knee osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of leech therapy as an adjunctive treatment in painful knee osteoarthritis, to investigate the onset of action, to evaluate patients' acceptance of this treatment, and to investigate the side effects of the procedure. DESIGN: Observational, controlled, nonrandomized pilot-study. SETTING: Subjects were inpatients of an academic teaching hospital of the University of Essen, Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Essen, Germany. PATIENTS: 16 inpatients (mean age 69 +/- 9 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee joint; 10 patients were treated with leeches and 6 served as controls. INTERVENTION: A single trial of 4 leeches (Hirudo medicinalis) applied topically at painful periarticular sites of the knee joint in the experimental group (n = 10). Both groups received conventional treatment for pain with the exclusion of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported general knee pain, assessed by visual analog scale for 10 days daily and in a follow-up after 28 days. Frequency of adverse effects also was recorded. RESULTS: Periarticular application of 4 leeches led to rapid relief of pain with sustained improvement after 4 weeks in the absence of major complications. CONCLUSION: Leech therapy may be an effective treatment for rapid reduction of pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee. Its efficacy should be tested in larger randomized controlled trials with assessment of expectation bias.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Pilot controlled study of single application of 4 leeches to painful knee osteoarthritis demonstrated rapid relief of pain with sustained improvement at 4 weeks in the absence of major complications.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese beobachtende, kontrollierte, nicht randomisierte Pilotstudie untersuchte die Blutegeltherapie bei 16 stationären Patienten mit Kniegelenksarthrose, wobei vier Hirudo medicinalis-Blutegel an schmerzhaften periartikulären Stellen bei 10 Patienten appliziert wurden, während 6 als Kontrollen dienten; beide Gruppen erhielten eine konventionelle Schmerzbehandlung unter Ausschluss von NSAIDs. Die Autoren berichten über eine rasche Schmerzlinderung und anhaltende Verbesserung nach 4 Wochen in der Blutegelgruppe ohne schwerwiegende Komplikationen. Dies ist für die ASH als vorläufige klinische Evidenz für die Blutegeltherapie im Symptommanagement der Arthrose relevant. Wesentliche Einschränkungen sind die kleine Stichprobengröße, das nicht randomisierte Design ohne Kontrolle des Erwartungsbias sowie die eigene Schlussfolgerung der Autoren, dass die Wirksamkeit in größeren randomisierten kontrollierten Studien geprüft werden sollte.
Zitation
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 26, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026