Medicinal leeches and the microsurgeon: a four-year study, clinical series and risk benefit review
Cohort series published in Microsurgery (2011)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are case reports and small series in the literature relating to the use of medicinal leeches by plastic surgeons; however, larger series from individual units are rare. The aim of this article is to present a comprehensive 4-year case series of the use of medicinal leeches, discuss the current evidence regarding indications, risks, and benefits and highlight the recent updates regarding leech speciation. METHODS: Patients prescribed leeches in a 4-year period (July 2004-2008) were collated from hospital pharmacy records (N = 35). The number of leeches used, demographic, clinical, and microbiological details were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated with leeches. The age range was 2 to 98 years (mean = 49.3). Leeches were most commonly used for venous congestion in pedicled flaps and replantations. Blood transfusions were necessary in 12 cases (34%) [mean = 2.8 units, range 2-5 units]. Our infection rate was 20% (7/35) including five infections with Aeromonas spp. (14.2%). The proportion of patients becoming infected after leech therapy was significantly greater in the group of patients that did not receive prophylactic antibiotic treatment (Fisher's Exact test P = 0.0005). In total, 14 cases (40%) were salvaged in entirety, in 7 cases 80% or more, in 2 cases 50 to 79%, and in 1 case less than 50% of the tissues were salvaged. In 11 cases (31%), the tissues were totally lost. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights both the benefits and the risks to patients in selected clinical situations and also the potential risks. The routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis is supported. In view of the emerging evidence that Hirudo verbana are now used as standard leech therapy, and the primary pathogen is Aeromonas veronii, until a large prospective multicenter study is published, large series of patients treated with leeches should be reported.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Four-year case series of 35 patients prescribed leeches: 34% required blood transfusion, 20% developed infection (14% Aeromonas), 40% had complete tissue salvage. Patients without antibiotic prophylaxis had significantly higher infection rates.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Dieser Artikel stellt eine retrospektive Fallserie über 4 Jahre mit 35 Patienten vor, die mit medizinischen Blutegeln bei venöser Kongestion in gestielten Lappenplastiken und Replantationen behandelt wurden, und berichtet über eine Infektionsrate von 20 % (7/35), darunter fünf Aeromonas-spp.-Infektionen. Die Studie ergab, dass Infektionen signifikant häufiger bei Patienten auftraten, die keine prophylaktischen Antibiotika erhielten (P = 0,0005), was eine routinemäßige Antibiotikaprophylaxe stützt, und wies auf neuere Erkenntnisse hin, dass Hirudo verbana nun die Standardart ist und Aeromonas veronii der Haupterreger. Dies ist für ASH hochrelevant und liefert reale Outcome- und Sicherheitsdaten aus einer klinischen Serie von beachtlicher Größe. Zu den Einschränkungen gehören das retrospektive Design und die relativ kleine Stichprobe aus einer einzigen Abteilung, was die Generalisierbarkeit einschränkt.
Zitation
Medicinal leeches and the microsurgeon: a four-year study, clinical series and risk benefit review.
Whitaker IS, Josty IC, Hawkins S et al. · Microsurgery, 2011
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 26, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026