Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Meat grinder-related hand injuries: a 50-year systematic review of case reports

Systematic review published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2025)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienAlhusain et al. · Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meat grinder-related hand injuries often result in severe tissue damage, including deep lacerations, avulsions, and amputations, leading to significant functional impairments. This systematic review examines injury characteristics, management approaches, and outcomes, based on published case reports and series. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. English-language case reports and series from January 1975 to June 2024 were analyzed for demographics, injury patterns, treatments, and outcomes. RESULTS: Thirteen studies comprising 121 patients were included, with a slight female predominance (52.89%). Patient ages ranged from 1 to 42 years, and 21.48% presented with hands still entrapped. Fingers were the most frequently injured site (31.40%). Initial management involved debridement (12.39%) and amputations (9.09%). Microsurgical revascularization was attempted in 4.95% of cases. Follow-up data revealed sensory deficits in 57.14% and motor deficits in 46.42% of patients. Only 3 patients utilized prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Meat grinder-related hand injuries present significant management challenges, with low replantation rates and high rates of long-term functional deficits. Despite surgical interventions, persistent impairments remain common. Further research is necessary to refine treatment protocols and improve patient outcomes.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Zusammenfassung

50-year systematic review of meat-grinder hand-injury case reports including replantation/revascularization with adjunctive therapies.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This systematic review analyzes 121 cases of meat grinder-related hand injuries from case reports published between January 1975 and June 2024, examining injury characteristics, management approaches (debridement, amputation, microsurgical revascularization), and long-term functional outcomes including sensory and motor deficits. The study found low replantation rates and high rates of persistent functional impairment. There is no mention of leeches, hirudotherapy, or the leech secretome anywhere in the abstract. CAVEAT: This article has no defensible relevance to hirudotherapy or ASH's domain based on its abstract.

Zitation

Meat grinder-related hand injuries: a 50-year systematic review of case reports.

Alhusain et al. · Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.