The Use of the Implantable Doppler Probe as a Blood Flow Monitoring Device in Clinical Settings: A Narrative Review of the Evidence.
Review published in Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation (2023)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In the past decade, the implantable Doppler probe has been studied widely as a blood flow-monitoring device in reconstructive and transplant surgical specialities. Its utility as an effective postoperative monitoring technique is still debatable, with no clear guidelines in clinical practice. Here, we mapped the current evidence on the usefulness of the implantable Doppler probe as a blood flow-monitoring device. The objective was to present an up-to-date assessment of the benefits and limitations of using implantable Doppler probes in clinical and experimental clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a literature search using the Cochrane Library and Healthcare Databases Advanced Search and using implantable Doppler probe, transplant, graft, and flap as key words. The search yielded 184 studies, with 73 studies included after exclusions. We evaluated, synthesized, and summarized the evidence from the studies in tabular form. RESULTS: There is clinical equipoise regarding the effectiveness of implantable Doppler probe as a flow sensing technique. The main reason is the lack of information and gaps in the evidence regarding the benefits and limitations of using implantable Doppler probes in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The implantable Doppler probe has the potentialto be used as an adjunctpostoperativeblood flow-monitoring device. However, keeping in view of technical limitations, its signals should be interpreted alongside traditional clinical assessment techniques to determine the patency of microvascular anastomosis. Although evidence in this review will inform clinical practice in transplant and reconstructive surgical specialties, a prospective randomized controlled study with a larger patient cohort is required to evaluate the effectiveness of this probe in clinical settings.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
In the past decade, the implantable Doppler probe has been studied widely as a blood flow-monitoring device in reconstructive and transplant surgical specialities. Its utility as an effective postoperative monitoring technique is still debatable, with no clear guidelines in clinical practice.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese systematische Übersichtsarbeit evaluierte 73 Studien zur implantierbaren Doppler-Sonde als postoperatives Gerät zur Blutflussüberwachung in der rekonstruktiven Chirurgie und Transplantationschirurgie und stellte ein klinisches Equipoise bezüglich ihrer Wirksamkeit fest, das auf Evidenzlücken zu Nutzen und Einschränkungen zurückzuführen ist. Die Autoren schlussfolgern, dass die Sonde als ergänzendes Überwachungsinstrument dienen kann, jedoch gemeinsam mit der traditionellen klinischen Beurteilung interpretiert werden sollte, und dass größere randomisierte Studien erforderlich sind. Dieser Artikel weist keine vertretbare Relevanz für die Hirudotherapie oder das Blutegelsekretom auf; er betrifft ein Medizinprodukt zum vaskulären Monitoring und bezieht weder Blutegel, Antikoagulation noch aus Blutegeln stammende Substanzen ein.
Zitation
The Use of the Implantable Doppler Probe as a Blood Flow Monitoring Device in Clinical Settings: A Narrative Review of the Evidence.
Malik et al. · Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation, 2023
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026