Comparison of the effectiveness of medicinal leech and TENS therapy in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of leech therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in terms of duration of effectiveness and symptom relief and to compare these results with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was designed as a prospective, single center, randomized, single-blind and parallel group study. A total of 90 patients were included in the study, 46 in the leech group and 44 in the TENS group. Primary outcome measures were changes of the pain scores in visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) on the measurements day 0, 21 and 180. Secondary outcome measures were the changes in the sub-groups of the WOMAC scores. Five leeches were applied to the affected knee, once every week for 3 weeks. RESULTS: The VAS pain score showed a similar decrease in both groups in the evaluation on day 21 (p < 0.001). The course of the change of the VAS pain score in both groups was similar in the comparisons between groups. Long-term benefits of the TENS therapy group were slightly more than the leech therapy group. All the sub-scores of WOMAC in both therapy groups showed a similar decrease (p = 0.819). Throughout the study this decrease was statistically significant in both groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Leech therapy relieves symptoms in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and is as effective as TENS therapy in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee. This treatment has the potential of being an additional or alternative therapy for the non-surgical management of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Randomized comparison of leech therapy (n=46) versus TENS (n=44) for primary knee osteoarthritis demonstrates similar significant VAS pain and WOMAC reductions at days 21 and 180, validating leech therapy as effective alternative.

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

More peer-reviewed studies in Klinische Studien.

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigation of the therapeutic effects of medicinal leech treatment on lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion injury — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Efficacy of Medicinal Leech Therapy in Diverse Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Study from Azerbaijan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudotherapy Efficacy and Complications in the Management of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review — Foppiani J et al. (2024)
• Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →