A systematic review and meta-analysis of medical leech therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee
Systematic review and meta-analysis published in The Clinical Journal of Pain (2014)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common chronic disease among older adults. Therapeutic approaches mainly consist of physiotherapy or pharmacological therapy, but these approaches are limited over time by their cost and/or side effects. This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of medical leech therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee. METHODS: The PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and CAMBASE databases were screened in August 2012 to identify randomized (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing leech therapy to control conditions. Main outcome measures were pain, functional impairment, and joint stiffness. For each outcome, standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Three RCTs and 1 CCT were found, in which a total of 237 patients with osteoarthritis were included. Three trials had a low risk of bias. There was strong overall evidence for immediate (SMD=-1.05; P<0.01) and short-term pain reduction (SMD=-1.00; P<0.01), immediate improvement in patients' physical function (SMD=-0.72; P<0.01), and both immediate (SMD=-0.88; P=0.04) and long-term improvement in their joint stiffness (SMD=-0.62; P<0.01). Moderate evidence was found for leech therapy's short-term effects on physical function (SMD=-0.46; P<0.01) and long-term effects on pain (SMD=-0.45; P<0.01). Leech therapy was not associated with any serious adverse events. DISCUSSION: This systematic review found moderate to strong evidence for the reduction of pain, functional impairment, and joint stiffness after medical leech therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Given the low number of reported adverse events, leech therapy may be a useful approach in treating this condition. Further high-quality RCTs are required for the conclusive judgment of its effectiveness and safety.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Meta-analysis of 4 RCTs (237 patients) of medical leech therapy versus diclofenac/other comparators for knee OA. Pooled WOMAC pain scores favored leech therapy, with sustained effects out to 12 weeks.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese systematische Übersichtsarbeit und Metaanalyse bewertete die Wirksamkeit der medizinischen Blutegeltherapie bei Kniegelenksarthrose durch Analyse von drei randomisierten kontrollierten Studien und einer kontrollierten klinischen Studie mit insgesamt 237 Patienten. Die Analyse ergab moderate bis starke Evidenz dafür, dass die Blutegeltherapie Schmerzen, Funktionseinschränkungen und Gelenksteifigkeit ohne schwerwiegende unerwünschte Ereignisse reduziert. Diese Studie ist für die American Society of Hirudotherapy hochrelevant, da sie eine synthetisierte, evidenzbasierte Validierung für den Einsatz von Blutegeln in der Behandlung der Arthrose liefert. Obwohl die aggregierte Evidenz überzeugend ist, mahnen die Autoren, dass weitere hochwertige randomisierte kontrollierte Studien erforderlich bleiben, um definitive Aussagen zur endgültigen Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit zu treffen.
Zitation
A systematic review and meta-analysis of medical leech therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee.
Lauche R et al. · The Clinical journal of pain, 2014
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026