Impact of the number of veins repaired in short-term digital replantation survival rate

BACKGROUND: Venous congestion/insufficiency plays a major role in failure of finger replantation. Despite acceptable salvage rates with postoperative anticoagulation or leeching, operative technique remains the most important predictor of success. However, there are no indications in the literature on the benefit of anastomosing single versus multiple veins. METHODS: A retrospective review of finger amputations from 2011 to 2013 was conducted. The analyzed endpoint was the finger survival rate at discharge depending on the number of veins repaired: multiple veins (group 1), only one vein (group 2), or no veins (group 3). Proportions were compared using v2 tests/Fisher's exact tests; p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with complete digital amputation were operated including 101 fingers. Twenty-seven fingers (26.7%) failed before hospital discharge, with 78% of failures due to venous complications versus 22% with an arterial etiology. Group 2 had 15 replantation failures due to venous causes as opposed to only one from group 1, representing a 1.27-fold (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99, 1.34) increased relative risk of failure (p = 0.032). Similarly, five fingers from group 3 suffered venous complications, resulting in a 1.49-fold (95% CI: 1.02, 1.73) increased likelihood of failure in comparison to group 1 (p = 0.008). No significant difference was observed between having only one vein repaired versus none (RR: 1.1792, 95% CI: 0.83, 2.10, p = 0.502). CONCLUSION: Efforts toward favoring two-vein repair lead to better survival of the replanted fingers. More cases need to be analyzed before formulating conclusions on specific levels of amputation with regard to venous anastomoses.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Across 72 patients and 101 finger replantations, 78% of failures were due to venous complications; two-vein repair was associated with significantly higher survival than single-vein repair, helping define when leech adjunct is most needed.

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

More peer-reviewed studies in Klinische Studien.

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigation of the therapeutic effects of medicinal leech treatment on lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion injury — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Efficacy of Medicinal Leech Therapy in Diverse Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Study from Azerbaijan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudotherapy Efficacy and Complications in the Management of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review — Foppiani J et al. (2024)
• Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →