Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a frequent complication after cardiac surgery

Review published in Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss (2007)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewArzneimittelentwicklungKlinische StudienPouplard C et al. · Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 2007

Abstract

Thrombocytopenia is a common problem in cardiovascular patients, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is therefore frequently suspected. Unfractionated heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass is particularly immunogenic as 25% to 50% post-cardiac surgery patients develop heparin-dependent antibodies but only 1 to 3% will develop HIT. These antibodies recognize a 'self protein', platelet factor 4 (PF4), bound to heparin. Antibodies associated with a high risk of HIT are mainly IgG1 which strongly activate platelets and coagulation, thereby causing thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. A biphasic evolution of platelet count with a secondary decrease after a previous increase following CPB or non-recovery of thrombocytopenia within 6 days post-operatively always requires screening for HIT antibodies. Both functional (platelet activation tests) and immunologic assays (antigen assays) are necessary in every patient to establish the diagnosis of HIT. When the clinical probability of HIT is high, the first requirement is to discontinue heparin, without waiting for results of laboratory investigations. An alternative anticoagulant such as danaparoid sodium (Orgaran) or lepirudin (Refludan) must then be administered since heparin withdrawal alone is insufficient to control the prothrombotic state associated with HIT. The risk of HIT will probably soon decrease due to the wider use of fondaparinux, which does not interact in vitro with PF4, but it could remain significant in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAntibodiesAnticoagulantsCardiac Surgical ProceduresChondroitin SulfatesDermatan SulfateHeparinHeparinoidsHeparan SulfateHirudinsHumansImmunoglobulin GPlatelet Factor 4

Zusammenfassung

Cardiac surgery HIT review: 25-50% develop heparin-dependent antibodies but only 1-3% develop HIT; danaparoid or lepirudin required to control prothrombotic state.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This review addresses heparin-induced thrombocytopenia as a frequent concern after cardiac surgery, noting that 25–50% of post-cardiac surgery patients develop heparin-dependent antibodies but only 1–3% develop HIT, and describes diagnostic algorithms combining functional and immunologic assays with clinical probability assessment. The abstract explicitly states that alternative anticoagulants including lepirudin (Refludan) must be administered when HIT is clinically probable, as heparin withdrawal alone is insufficient to control the prothrombotic state. This is relevant to ASH's domain because the abstract names lepirudin (Refludan) as a required alternative anticoagulant in a high-risk surgical population, though the abstract itself does not identify lepirudin as hirudin-derived or mention leeches. The caveat is that the abstract focuses on perioperative cardiac surgery management, provides no primary experimental data, and offers no detail on lepirudin-specific pharmacology or outcomes beyond its naming as an alternative agent.

Zitation

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a frequent complication after cardiac surgery.

Pouplard C et al. · Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 2007

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.