Impact of closed-incision negative pressure therapy in donor-site complications in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Analysis of 705 patients and 1125 flaps.
Research article published in Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS (2025)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been shown to reduce complication rates in breast reconstruction (BR). This study aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) donor-site incisions managed with ciNPT compared to standard dressings. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients ≥18 years who underwent DIEP flap BR from 2015 to 2023. Patients who underwent reconstruction with alternative flaps or converted to transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous were excluded. Patients were categorized according to the use of ciNPT vs. standard dressings. The unpaired t- and Fisher's Exact tests were used to assess the differences between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 705 patients were included, with 68 (9.6%) managed with ciNPT. Patients treated with ciNPT had significantly higher mean body mass index (BMI) (34.0 vs. 28.5 kg/m2; p<0.001) compared to the control group. Higher rates of alcohol use (59.2% vs. 41.2%; p=0.006) and hormonal therapy use (41.3% vs. 17.9%; p<0.001) were found in the standard dressing group. Univariate analyses showed no significant differences in donor-site postoperative outcomes across the groups. However, multivariate logistic regression models demonstrated a reduced likelihood of surgical site infection (OR 0.187; 95% CI 0.045-0.768); p=0.020), and wound dehiscence (OR 0.338; 95% CI 0.155-0.738); p=0.006) among the ciNPT users. Particularly, in patients with BMI >30 kg/m2, ciNPT use (OR 0.282; 95% CI 0.098-0.812; p=0.019) was found to be a significant protective factor against wound complications compared to the standard of care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ciNPT may improve wound complication rates in DIEP flap donor sites, especially in patients with high BMI. Further research is necessary to elucidate the cost-effectiveness of ciNPT based on the patient risk profiles.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been shown to reduce complication rates in breast reconstruction (BR). This study aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) donor-site incisions managed with ciNPT compared to standard dressings.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese umfangreiche retrospektive Studie an 705 Patienten untersuchte, ob die geschlossene Inzisions-Negativdrucktherapie (ciNPT) im Vergleich zu Standardverbänden Spenderstellen-Komplikationen bei der DIEP-Lappen-Brustrekonstruktion reduziert. Die multivariate Analyse zeigte, dass ciNPT die Rate an chirurgischen Wundinfektionen und Wunddehiszenzen reduzierte, insbesondere bei Patienten mit einem BMI >30. Sie ist nur tangential für das Gebiet der ASH relevant, da bei der Brustrekonstruktion mit freien Lappen Komplikationen auftreten können, bei denen medizinische Blutegeltherapie adjuvant bei venöser Kongestion eingesetzt werden kann. Das Abstract erwähnt weder Blutegel, Hirudotherapie noch das Management venöser Kongestion, wodurch die Relevanz indirekt ist.
Zitation
Impact of closed-incision negative pressure therapy in donor-site complications in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Analysis of 705 patients and 1125 flaps.
Escobar-Domingo et al. · Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 2025
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026