Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Effect of vasopressor use on digit survival after replantation and revascularization - a large retrospective cohort study

Retrospective study published in Microsurgery (2019)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportKlinische StudienRetrouvey H et al. · Microsurgery, 2019

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the common use of intraoperative vasopressors in hand microsurgery, the association between intraoperative vasopressor use and digital replant failure has not yet been examined. Our study aims to examine the association between intraoperative vasopressor use (phenylephrine and/or ephedrine) and postoperative digital failure of replanted or revascularized digits. METHODS: All patients from a single tertiary hand center who underwent unilateral digital replantation or revascularization procedures between 2005 and 2016 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The relationship between intraoperative vasopressors used to maintain hemodynamic stability and digit failure was then evaluated using logistic regression. Specifically, phenylephrine (total dose 10-3,600 mcg) and ephedrine (5-110 mg) use were evaluated. RESULTS: During the study period, 281 patients underwent digital replantation or revascularization. Of those, 86 (31%) were given an intraoperative vasopressor. Digit failure was more likely in patients with crush or avulsion injuries compared to clean-cut mechanism (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, p = .02), and in patients with replantation (OR 7.85, p < .0001) as compared to revascularization procedures. Using multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, comorbidities, number of digits injured, injury type, and procedure type, the odds of digital failure with vasopressor use were not increased (p = .84). When evaluating vasopressors used after tourniquet deflation, failure increased with ephedrine use (OR = 2.42, p = .0496) and phenylephrine use (OR = 2.21, p = .31). CONCLUSIONS: The use of vasopressors was not associated with failure if administration of vasopressors was before tourniquet deflation. The administration of vasopressors after tourniquet deflation should be cautioned.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAdultAmputation, TraumaticEphedrineFemaleFinger InjuriesHumansIntraoperative CareLogistic ModelsMaleMicrosurgeryMiddle AgedPhenylephrine

Zusammenfassung

Cohort of 281 digital replant/revascularization patients showing vasopressor use after tourniquet deflation increased failure odds (ephedrine OR 2.42, phenylephrine OR 2.21). Pre-tourniquet-deflation use safe.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This large retrospective cohort study (281 patients) examined whether intraoperative vasopressor use (phenylephrine and/or ephedrine) during digital replantation or revascularization was associated with digit failure. Multivariate analysis found no increased failure risk when vasopressors were given before tourniquet deflation, but ephedrine use after deflation was associated with higher failure (OR 2.42, p=0.0496). The relevance to ASH's domain is indirect: this study concerns perioperative pharmacologic management in the same microsurgical replantation setting where medicinal leeches may be used for venous congestion, but it does not mention leeches or leech therapy. No direct evidence about hirudotherapy is provided, and the study is retrospective and single-center.

Zitation

Effect of vasopressor use on digit survival after replantation and revascularization - a large retrospective cohort study.

Retrouvey H et al. · Microsurgery, 2019

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.