Microsurgical ear replantation without venous repair: failure of development of venous channels despite patency of arterial anastomosis for 14 days
Case report published in Ann Plast Surg (2001)
Abstract
The authors describe a case of microvascular ear replantation with repair of the artery only and medicinal leech therapy that survived for 14 days but ultimately failed as a result of the absence of development of venous channels between the replant and the recipient bed. A 35-year-old man presented with complete avulsion of 80% of the right external ear. The auricle was revascularized successfully via transposition of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and end-to-end anastomosis between the STA and an identified arterial branch on the posterior surface of the ear, using the technique of longitudinal wedge resection. No suitable veins could be found, therefore medicinal leech therapy was used for venous drainage as well as for systemic heparinization. Although the replant remained viable, frequency of leeching did not decrease over 2 weeks. On postoperative day 14, despite obvious viability of the replanted ear, leeching was stopped, considering the ongoing blood loss. Unfortunately, the auricle was found to be necrosed totally the following day. In retrospect, the authors think that inadequate debridement of nonvital tissues may have led to the failure of development of venous channels between the replant and the recipient bed, as manifested by the frequent requirement of leeching to relieve venous congestion long after revascularization. They conclude that the importance of thorough debridement cannot be overemphasized in microsurgical ear replantation with no vein anastomosis, as demonstrated in their patient. From the point of view of creation of venous drainage channels, deepithelialization of the posterior ear skin may be beneficial.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
Avulsed ear in 35-year-old male revascularized via single arterial anastomosis with leech therapy for 14 days; auricle necrosed due to absent venous channel development.
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
This case report describes a 35-year-old man who underwent microvascular ear replantation with arterial repair only and adjunctive medicinal leech therapy for venous drainage, with the replant surviving 14 days before failing due to absence of venous channel development. The case is directly relevant to hirudotherapy as it illustrates both the use and limitations of leech therapy in maintaining tissue viability when venous repair is not possible. The authors attribute failure to inadequate debridement preventing venous ingrowth, noting that leeching frequency did not decrease over two weeks and that ongoing blood loss necessitated stopping treatment. This is a single case report, and while it provides practical insights into the limits of leech-dependent venous drainage, no generalizable conclusions can be drawn from this one experience.
Zitation
Microsurgical ear replantation without venous repair: failure of development of venous channels despite patency of arterial anastomosis for 14 days.
Akyurek M et al. · Annals of plastic surgery, 2001
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026