Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Achieving Textbook Outcomes in Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Does a Co-Surgeon Matter?

Research article published in Journal of reconstructive microsurgery (2025)

Zuletzt aktualisiert: June 18, 2026Geprüft von: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Observational studyKlinische StudienDeVito et al. · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is essential to examine predictors of ideal outcomes in surgery. "Textbook outcomes" are optimal surgical results based on multiple quality measures. It is important that patients have access to trusted centers that consistently produce high-quality surgical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of all bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions at our institution from 2017 to 2022 was performed. Criteria for "textbook outcome" were operating room (OR) time within one standard deviation of institutional average or less, length of stay ≤ 4 days, no intraoperative complications, no operative complications, no readmission within 30 days, no infection requiring IV antibiotics, no systemic complications, and no mortality. Propensity score matching was used to control for common comorbidities, reconstruction timing, and oncologic factors. This resulted in 47 matched pairs of bilateral DIEP flap reconstructions for comparison between a single-surgeon cohort and a co-surgeon cohort. RESULTS: Textbook outcomes occurred at a significantly higher rate in the co-surgeon cohort compared with the single surgeon cohort (79% vs. 57%, p = 0.025). The average OR time was significantly shorter in the co-surgeon cohort compared with the single surgeon cohort (403 minutes vs. 572 minutes, p < 0.0001), and elevated OR time was the most common reason for not achieving a textbook outcome. There were no differences in the other criteria for a "textbook outcome." CONCLUSION: Textbook outcomes in bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction are achieved at significantly higher rates with a co-surgeon. This is primarily due to significantly shorter OR times. Further research into factors affecting textbook outcomes is needed.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeComparative StudyJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsRetrospective StudiesOperative TimeLength of StayTreatment OutcomeMammaplastyPropensity ScoreHumansMaleFemaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareSurgeons

Zusammenfassung

It is essential to examine predictors of ideal outcomes in surgery. "Textbook outcomes" are optimal surgical results based on multiple quality measures.

Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist

This retrospective review used propensity-score matching to compare 47 pairs of bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions performed by a single surgeon versus a co-surgeon team. It found higher 'textbook outcome' rates in the co-surgeon cohort (79% vs. 57%, p = 0.025), mainly due to shorter average operating-room time (403 vs. 572 minutes, p < 0.0001), with no significant differences in the other measured criteria. The study addresses surgical-team configuration and operative efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction. It does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, flap salvage for venous congestion, or the leech secretome, so it offers no direct evidence for hirudotherapy and no defensible leech-therapy link can be drawn from this abstract.

Zitation

Achieving Textbook Outcomes in Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Does a Co-Surgeon Matter?

DeVito et al. · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 2025

Verwandter klinischer Kontext

Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 28, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: June 18, 2026

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.