Comparisons of medicinal leech therapy with venous catheterization in the treatment of venous congestion of the sural flap
Randomized controlled trial published in Microsurgery (2010)
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The originally described distally based sural flap technique has a risk of partial or total flap necrosis as high as 25%. The purpose of this study was to compare the medicinal leech therapy (MLT) with venous catheterization (VC) for blood volume removal, infection, wound dehiscence, and flap necrosis in the distally based sural flap with venous congestion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six conventional distally based sural flaps with venous congestion during reconstructive surgeries were randomly divided into two groups, MLT group and VC group. The results of comparisons were analyzed using SPSS software (SPSS for Windows Ver.11.5). RESULTS: There were significant differences in terms of the average volume of removed blood (53.6cc vs.172.2cc), infection (10.7% vs. 34.6%), wound dehiscence (10.7% vs. 42.3%), flap necrosis (3.6% vs. 19.2%), and nursing (7.8 vs. 5.19) and patient's satisfaction (8.03 vs. 5.6) in the VC group and MLT group, respectively. Although local heparin irrigation was performed in the VC group, the catheter was exchanged in 10 patients due to obstruction by clot. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that the VC be used for congested pedicled flaps instead of leech therapy, as VC is more effective, easy, and safe in blood removal, and it has less complication.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Zusammenfassung
RCT of 56 sural flaps with venous congestion comparing medicinal leech therapy versus venous catheterization. VC group showed less infection (10.7% vs 34.6%), wound dehiscence (10.7% vs 42.3%), and flap necrosis (3.6% vs 19.2%).
Warum dies für die Hirudotherapie relevant ist
Diese Studie an 56 distal gestielten Suralis-Lappen mit venöser Stauung, die randomisiert in zwei Gruppen aufgeteilt wurden, verglich die medizinische Blutegeltherapie (MLT) mit der Venenkatheterisierung (VC) hinsichtlich Blutentnahmevolumen, Infektion, Wunddehiszenz und Lappennekrose. Die MLT-Gruppe zeigte eine höhere durchschnittliche Blutentnahme (172,2 cm³ gegenüber 53,6 cm³ in der VC-Gruppe), jedoch höhere Raten an Infektionen (34,6 % gegenüber 10,7 %), Wunddehiszenz (42,3 % gegenüber 10,7 %) und Lappennekrose (19,2 % gegenüber 3,6 %), bei niedrigeren Pflege- und Patientenzufriedenheitswerten; die Autoren schlussfolgerten, dass die VC die Blutegeltherapie bei gestauten gestielten Lappen ersetzen sollte. Für ASH ist dies unmittelbar relevant als kontrollierter direkter Vergleich
Zitation
Comparisons of medicinal leech therapy with venous catheterization in the treatment of venous congestion of the sural flap.
Mozafari N et al. · Microsurgery, 2010
Verwandter klinischer Kontext
Erfahren Sie, wie diese Forschung mit der klinischen Praxis verknüpft ist
Zur ASH-Bibliothek hinzugefügt: May 27, 2026 · Letzte Aktualisierung der Website: 18. Juni 2026