Американское общество гирудотерапии

Two cases of microscopic replantation of auricular dissection in different planes

Case report published in Medicine (2025)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Case reportКлинические исследованияZhao et al. · Medicine, 2025

Abstract

RATIONALE: Auricular lacerations are commonly encountered in clinical practice, and such injuries can cause significant damage to both the appearance of the face and the emotional well-being of the individual. This case report presents the clinical experience and key considerations of microreplantation of auricular lacerations in different planes, aiming to provide a reference for clinical treatment. PATIENT CONCERNS: This study analyzed 6 cases of auricular avulsion microsurgical replantation, all achieving excellent clinical outcomes. After systematically evaluating various anatomical planes, long-term follow-up (up to 6 years), and different surgical techniques (anterograde vs retrograde replantation), we present 2 representative cases. All patients underwent meticulous preoperative assessment of the avulsed auricles followed by successful microsurgical replantation. Postoperative results demonstrated well-survived replanted auricles without significant pigmentation changes, near-complete sensory recovery, and fully preserved auditory function. DIAGNOSES: Due to various unpredictable causes such as trauma, the auricle can undergo avulsion at different planes, which is diagnosed through physical examination. The examination revealed exposed and fractured auricular cartilage at both the proximal and distal ends, with active bleeding points at the proximal ear and partial contusions at the distal auricle. INTERVENTIONS: According to the avulsion plane of the auricle, followed by meticulous debridement of both the proximal and distal segments under microscopy, employing a carpet-like excisional technique. Depending on the vascular anatomy and extent of tissue loss, either anterograde or retrograde microvascular replantation was performed. Long-term follow-up was conducted to evaluate outcomes. OUTCOMES: Both replanted auricles survived completely. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 6 months to 7 years. One patient developed a venous crisis leading to scab detachment and mild auricular collapse. Another case exhibited partial skin loss at the junction of the auricle and earlobe. At 10 weeks postoperatively, the second patient underwent a Z-plasty revision under local infiltration anesthesia to address the defect. At final follow-up, all replanted auricles showed no significant pigmentation, near-normal sensory recovery, and preserved auditory function. LESSONS: Intraoperative exploration of vascular integrity based on the level of injury is essential, allowing for precise microvascular anastomosis under microscopy. Adequate vascular anastomosis significantly promotes the survival of the replanted auricle.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleCase Reports
Indexed MeSH termsAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAmputation, TraumaticEar AuricleMicrosurgeryReplantationTreatment OutcomeMiddle Aged

Резюме

Two cases of microscopic auricular-dissection replantation across different anatomical planes.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This case report presents the clinical experience and key considerations of microsurgical replantation of auricular avulsion injuries at different anatomical planes, analyzing 6 cases (with 2 representative cases detailed) and achieving complete survival of replanted auricles with near-normal sensory recovery and preserved auditory function over follow-up periods ranging from 6 months to 7 years. One patient developed a venous crisis—a recognized complication in replantation surgery for which medicinal leeches are sometimes employed as adjunctive decongestive therapy, though the abstract makes no mention of leech use. The study is relevant to ASH only indirectly: it documents management of venous compromise in the reconstructive microsurgery setting where hirudotherapy has historical precedent. No leeches, leech-derived substances, or investigation of the leech secretome are involved.

Цитирование

Two cases of microscopic replantation of auricular dissection in different planes.

Zhao et al. · Medicine, 2025

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.