Американское общество гирудотерапии

The possible effects of iron loss from bloodletting on mortality from pneumonia in the nineteenth century

Historical / methodology analysis published in J Clin Epidemiol (2021)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewКлинические исследованияBrabin B et al. · Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate iron losses and disease severity following 19th century bloodletting in patients with pneumonia. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Benefits of bloodletting in pneumonia patients were contested during the 19th century. Although large blood volumes during infection were removed there was no systematic data collection assessing efficacy and knowledge of iron composition of blood was rudimentary. This observational analysis of historical data quantifies iron losses in pneumonia cases in relation to disease severity. RESULTS: Based on one detailed case series average blood volume removed for survivors was 830 mL (range 114-2272 mL), and mean recovery times were shorter in patients bled within 2 days of illness (P < 0.001). Average iron removed was 446 mg with phlebotomy done ≤2 days of illness presentation and 347 mg after >2 days of illness (P = 0.012). Across several European hospitals average case fatality in pneumonia patients receiving phlebotomy was higher than in those treated without phlebotomy (19.9% vs. 12.8%, OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.38-1.74, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Variable efficacy for bloodletting could at least in part be explained by altered iron status.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeHistorical ArticleJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAdultBloodlettingFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHumansIronIron DeficienciesMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia

Резюме

Quantitative analysis of 19th-century pneumonia bloodletting showing average 446 mg iron removed per phlebotomy and 19.9% case fatality versus 12.8% without phlebotomy.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This historical review analyzes iron losses resulting from 19th-century phlebotomy in pneumonia patients, finding that average blood volume removed was significant and that case fatality was higher in patients who received phlebotomy versus those who did not. The study examines historical blood-removal practices and their physiological consequences, specifically focusing on phlebotomy. Its relevance to ASH's domain is strictly indirect, as the abstract exclusively discusses phlebotomy and never mentions leeches or hirudotherapy. The connection is limited only to the shared historical concept of blood-removal therapeutics, and no direct link to leeches can be drawn from the provided abstract.

Цитирование

The possible effects of iron loss from bloodletting on mortality from pneumonia in the nineteenth century.

Brabin B et al. · Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.