Американское общество гирудотерапии

Supremacy of the pulse within the medicine of the enlightenment

Historical review published in Intern Med J (2025)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportКлинические исследованияShort et al. · Internal medicine journal, 2025

Abstract

For the minority of the British sick poor, the healing process was conducted as an in-patient in one of the emerging British voluntary hospitals and infirmaries. But those with fevers and contagious diseases were excluded from admission. During the subsequent truncated physical examination, the character of the pulse received especially close attention. The diagnostic regard paid to the pulse assumed the same pre-eminent consideration as bloodletting was within the therapeutic armamentarium. Fever was not considered a symptom within British medicine during the 18th century; rather, it was regarded as a disease sui generis. Indeed, the pulse was regarded as the most reliable guide to the existence of a febrile illness, and variations in the pulse character directed the physician to adopt certain therapeutic modalities. The rapid bounding pulse was a signal of an inflammatory fever, whilst slow low amplitude pulses inferred a typhus-like aetiology. The importance of the pulse to the 18th century practitioner's understanding of sickness, whereby its pre-eminence was gradually replaced by clinical thermometry adopted fitfully during the mid-19th century.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleHistorical Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansHistory, 18th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyFeverPulseUnited Kingdom

Резюме

Historical review of pulse-based diagnosis in Enlightenment-era medicine including bloodletting and leech-therapy traditions.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This historical article examines the pre-eminent role of pulse examination in 18th and 19th century British medicine, particularly in the diagnosis and management of febrile illness, noting that bloodletting was a primary therapeutic modality guided by pulse character. A rapid bounding pulse signaled inflammatory fever warranting therapeutic intervention. For ASH, this article provides historical context for the broader practice of bloodletting, within which hirudotherapy was one approach. CAVEAT: No leeches or hirudotherapy are mentioned; the bloodletting referenced is general phlebotomy, and the relevance to the leech secretome is purely historical and indirect.

Цитирование

Supremacy of the pulse within the medicine of the enlightenment.

Short et al. · Internal medicine journal, 2025

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.