Американское общество гирудотерапии

Intravenous Dabigatran for Anticoagulation during Cardiopulmonary Bypass in a Sheep Model

Research article published in Anesthesiology (2025)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Preclinical (animal)Геномика и протеомикаФармакология секрета слюнных желёзNadtochiy SM et al. · Anesthesiology, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heparin is the standard anticoagulant used during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, there are problems with heparin, including immunogenicity and variability of effect, that make a search for an alternative desirable. Dabigatran anticoagulation has been reported to provide adequate conditions for CPB in a rabbit model. This study used a sheep model of CPB to assess the efficacy of dabigatran and its reversibility with idarucizumab. METHODS: Twelve sheep were subjected to 120 min of CPB after anticoagulation with either intravenous dabigatran or heparin (N = 6 per group). In both groups, activated clotting time, kaolin/tissue factor-activated thromboelastography reaction time, and blood gases were monitored during and after CPB. Plasma dabigatran concentrations were measured during and after CPB. After CPB, two sections of each arterial filter were examined for thrombus using electron microscopy. Idarucizumab or protamine was administered after CPB to reverse anticoagulation, and the sheep were monitored for a subsequent 24 h. Plasma concentrations of inflammatory and coagulation markers were assessed at baseline, after 120 min of CPB, and 6 h after reversal administration. RESULTS: After 120 min of CPB, there was no visible thrombus or fibrin observed on the arterial line filters in either the dabigatran or heparin groups. Plasma dabigatran concentrations during CPB were below the target concentration (5 µg/ml), ranging from 1.7 ± 0.4 to 3.4 ± 1.5 µg/ml. In both groups, reaction time and activated clotting time values increased during CPB and then returned to nearly baseline levels after administration of the reversal agents. Interleukin-6 concentrations were elevated in the heparin group compared to the dabigatran group. Five sheep survived 24 h after idarucizumab administration. Four of six sheep survived 24 h after the administration of protamine. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that dabigatran effectively provides anticoagulation in a sheep CPB model, and idarucizumab successfully reverses its effects.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsDabigatranSheepCardiopulmonary BypassAntithrombinsAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDisease Models, AnimalModels, Animal

Резюме

Heparin is the standard anticoagulant used during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This study used a sheep model of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to assess the efficacy of intravenous dabigatran as an alternative anticoagulant to heparin and its reversibility with idarucizumab, finding that dabigatran provided effective anticoagulation with no visible thrombus on arterial filters, lower interleukin-6 levels compared to heparin, and successful reversal by idarucizumab. The abstract contains no mention of leeches, hirudotherapy, hirudin, or any leech-derived compounds, so no connection to ASH's domain can be established from the text. This is a preclinical animal study whose findings may not translate directly to humans, and it has no defensible relevance to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome.

Цитирование

Intravenous Dabigatran for Anticoagulation during Cardiopulmonary Bypass in a Sheep Model

Nadtochiy SM et al. · Anesthesiology, 2025

Связанный клинический контекст

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.