Американское общество гирудотерапии

What Are the Optimal Monitoring Techniques in Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction?

Review published in ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties (2016)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewКлинические исследованияMoubayed et al. · ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties, 2016

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the outcomes for widely used systems in terms of accuracy, salvage rates, and added cost compared to conventional monitoring. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the literature (high-impact report). RESULTS: The overall free flap success for head and neck reconstruction is at least 95% using any type of monitoring. Salvage rates in decreasing frequency of monitoring techniques are 85% with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), 81% with implantable Doppler, and 61.5% with conventional monitoring. False-positive rates in increasing frequency are 0% for NIRS, 0.4% for conventional monitoring, and <10% for implantable Doppler. Current data show implantable Doppler to be potentially cost-effective for institutions with a failure rate of at least 6%. Buried flaps may be monitored with conventional monitoring using an exteriorized paddle, or using implantable Doppler. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of advanced flap monitoring systems beyond conventional monitoring is related to the success rate of each institution. Cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to determine at what point NIRS becomes advantageous.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsHeadHumansMicrovesselsMonitoring, PhysiologicNeckPlastic Surgery ProceduresSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredSurgical FlapsUltrasonography, DopplerVascular Surgical Procedures

Резюме

We evaluated the outcomes for widely used systems in terms of accuracy, salvage rates, and added cost compared to conventional monitoring. We performed a narrative review of the literature (high-impact report).

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This review evaluated monitoring systems for free flaps in head and neck reconstruction, comparing near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), implantable Doppler, and conventional monitoring in terms of accuracy, salvage rates, false-positive rates, and cost-effectiveness. The overall free flap success rate was reported as at least 95% regardless of monitoring type, with NIRS showing the highest salvage rate (85%) and zero false positives, while implantable Doppler was potentially cost-effective at institutional failure rates of at least 6%. The abstract does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, venous congestion, or any connection to the leech secretome. There is no defensible leech link in this article.

Цитирование

What Are the Optimal Monitoring Techniques in Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction?

Moubayed et al. · ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties, 2016

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 28, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.