Американское общество гирудотерапии

Replantation of amputated facial tissues with microvascular anastomosis

Case series published in Microsurgery (1994)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Case reportКлинические исследованияБезопасность и инфекционный контрольJeng SF et al. · Microsurgery, 1994

Abstract

A challenge to the microsurgeon is perfecting the technique of replantation of small pieces of facial tissue, mainly because of the extremely small size of the arteries as well as a lack of suitable veins for drainage. In the past 4 years, we have had seven cases of facial amputations, which included one scalp, two nasal tips, two ears, one lower lip, and one eyebrow. All of these patients were replanted/revascularized by microvascular anastomosis. Only two of the cases had suitable veins for anastomosis. Alternative techniques used for improving venous outflow were arterio-venous fistula, chemical leeches, and pin pricks. Four of the cases were completely successful, two cases had partial loss of the replant, and one case failed due to absence of venous drainage. In facial amputation, an aggressive microsurgical attempt will result in more tissue surviving and a better cosmetic outcome than in any other reconstructive procedures.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeCase ReportsJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAdultAmputation, TraumaticBites, HumanEarEyebrowsFacial InjuriesFemaleHumansLipMaleMicrosurgeryMiddle Aged

Резюме

Seven cases of facial amputation (scalp, nasal tips, ears, lower lip, eyebrow) all underwent microvascular replantation/revascularization; only two cases had suitable veins for anastomosis, with alternative outflow techniques including chemical leeches and pin pricks.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This report describes seven facial amputation cases over four years—including scalp, nasal tip, ear, lip, and eyebrow injuries—that were replanted or revascularized by microvascular anastomosis. Only two cases had suitable veins for anastomosis, and arterio-venous fistula, chemical leeches, and pin pricks are listed as alternative techniques used to improve venous outflow. Four cases were completely successful, two had partial replant loss, and one failed due to absent venous drainage. The abstract mentions chemical leeches only as one alternative venous-outflow measure and provides no details on what it involved, when it was chosen, or outcomes attributable to it. Caveat: the article primarily concerns microsurgical replantation technique; live leech therapy is not discussed, so relevance to hirudotherapy is minimal and indirect.

Цитирование

Replantation of amputated facial tissues with microvascular anastomosis.

Jeng SF et al. · Microsurgery, 1994

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.