Американское общество гирудотерапии

Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh and Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty for Penile Reconstruction in Patients With Bladder Exstrophy

Research article published in The Journal of urology (2020)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportКлинические исследованияHarris TGW et al. · The Journal of urology, 2020

Abstract

PURPOSE: Male patients with exstrophy-epispadias complex have a congenitally short penis. Adolescent and adult patients often desire penile reconstruction to enable penetrative intercourse. When penile lengthening using local tissue and/or skin graft is unsuitable, phalloplasty is performed. We provide updated experiences using radial forearm free flap and pedicled anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty techniques over a 6-year period in exstrophy-epispadias complex patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent radial forearm free flap or pedicled anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty between 2013 and 2019 were reviewed. A total of 11 patients were identified, including 8 with classic bladder exstrophy and 3 with cloacal exstrophy. In each case, flap dimensions, donor and recipient vessels and nerves, complications, outcomes and subsequent surgical procedures are reported. RESULTS: A radial forearm free flap was performed in 6 patients and a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap in 5. Flap survival was observed in all cases and 5 patients subsequently received an inflatable penile prosthesis. Among patients undergoing a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap, there was 1 mortality from acute pulmonary embolism, and the other 4 required at least 1 debulking procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Phalloplasty is an important procedure in patients with exstrophy-epispadias complex with severe penile inadequacy. Both techniques have favorable long-term outcomes, although the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap frequently requires a later debulking procedure. The radial forearm free flap is preferred but if the radial forearm is overly thin and the risk of inflatable penile prosthesis extrusion is high, the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap is an acceptable alternative.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAdolescentAdultBladder ExstrophyEpispadiasForearmFree Tissue FlapsHumansMalePenile ProsthesisPenisPlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective Studies

Резюме

Male patients with exstrophy-epispadias complex have a congenitally short penis.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This article reports a 6-year surgical experience with pedicled anterolateral thigh flap and radial forearm free flap phalloplasty in 11 patients with bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex, documenting flap survival in all cases, one mortality from pulmonary embolism, and frequent need for debulking after anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction. The study is focused on reconstructive urological surgical techniques and outcomes. There is no mention of leeches, hirudotherapy, leech-derived anticoagulants, or any related intervention. While free flap surgery is a setting where medicinal leeches are sometimes used in other contexts to salvage venously congested flaps, this particular study did not employ leech therapy, and none of the complications or outcomes described involved leech-related interventions. The relevance to ASH's domain is therefore absent, with no defensible leech connection.

Цитирование

Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh and Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty for Penile Reconstruction in Patients With Bladder Exstrophy

Harris TGW et al. · The Journal of urology, 2020

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.