Американское общество гирудотерапии

Beyond Borders: A Global Microsurgery Training and Case Exposure Survey

Survey published in J Reconstr Microsurg (2023)

Последнее обновление: June 18, 2026Рецензент: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportКлинические исследованияChang C et al. · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 2023

Abstract

BACKGROUND:  Microsurgery is essential in modern reconstructive surgery and plastic surgery training. Surgeon's proficiency and experience are crucial for effective microsurgical interventions. Despite anecdotal evidence of varying quality of microsurgery training globally, no empirical studies have investigated this. We conducted a global survey to investigate microsurgical training and clinical case exposure among plastic surgery trainees worldwide. METHODS:  An online survey was conducted using a secure platform to gather information on microsurgical case exposure and training among plastic surgery trainees between August 2020 and April 2021. Participants provided consent and completed a 37-question survey across four themes: clinical caseload, surgical exposure to microsurgery, microsurgical simulation training exposure, and barriers and opportunities. RESULTS:  A total of 202 responses were received, with most respondents in formal training programs (86.7%). The data highlighted regional variation in microsurgery case indications and flap types, with North America and Europe exhibiting the highest activity levels in microsurgery. Trainees in Asia have the highest cumulative practical exposure in microsurgery, followed by Australia and Oceania, and North America. Only 39.6% of respondents reported formal microsurgical simulation training, and almost one-third (29.7%) received no simulation training. Trainee access to practical experience is limited by several factors, including insufficient time and procedure complexity. Notably, practical experience was most commonly denied without reason being given. CONCLUSION:  Our study highlights significant disparities in microsurgical training and exposure among plastic surgery trainees globally. Further research is needed to identify strategies for addressing these issues, given the growing demand for complex reconstructive microsurgery and its impact on health care inequalities.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansMicrosurgeryClinical CompetencePlastic Surgery ProceduresSurgery, PlasticSurveys and Questionnaires

Резюме

Global survey of 202 plastic surgery trainees showed Asian trainees have highest cumulative practical microsurgery exposure; only 39.6% reported formal simulation training and 29.7% received none.

Почему это важно для гирудотерапии

This study conducted a global survey of 202 plastic surgery trainees to investigate disparities in microsurgical training, clinical case exposure, and simulation access across regions. The findings revealed significant regional variation in case indications and flap types, with only 39.6% of respondents reporting formal simulation training and nearly one-third receiving none. This article has no direct relevance to hirudotherapy, the leech secretome, or the American Society of Hirudotherapy's domain—it focuses entirely on surgical case exposure and educational disparities, and contains no mention of leeches, leech-derived compounds, or hirudotherapy techniques.

Цитирование

Beyond Borders: A Global Microsurgery Training and Case Exposure Survey.

Chang C et al. · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 2023

Связанный клинический контекст

Узнайте, как это исследование связано с клинической практикой

Добавлено в библиотеку ASH: May 27, 2026 · Последнее обновление сайта: June 18, 2026

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.