Anticoagulation Management for Impella Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: An Analysis of a Single-Center Experience.
Research article published in The Annals of pharmacotherapy (2020)
Resumen
BACKGROUND: Impella devices offer temporary mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock. The manufacturer recommends systemic anticoagulation with a target activated clotting time of 160 to 180 s but provides no guidance on how to manage both the heparinized purge solution and the additional intravenous heparin needed to reach this therapeutic range. Previous publications demonstrated a lack of standardization in heparin management for Impella devices. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of 2 different heparin protocols for long-term Impella support. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included adult patients on Impella support for greater than 24 hours. The primary end point was time to therapeutic range measured in hours, from time of implantation to the first of 2 consecutive measurements within the therapeutic range. Secondary end points included percentage of time in therapeutic range, rates of major bleeding, pump thrombosis, hemolysis, and nursing satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 19 patients identified, with 7 using the original protocol and 12 using the revised protocol. Time to therapeutic range was similar between protocols (15.5 vs 12 hours, P = NS). Another 14 patients were managed with patient-specific protocols as a result of bleeding or physician preference. In total, 42% of all patients in this study experienced major bleeding. There were no confirmed thrombosis events. This study was limited by a small sample size. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Despite using different heparin protocols, outcomes and bleeding events were similar between groups. Future studies are needed to determine the optimal degree of anticoagulation necessary to reduce bleeding risk.
Resumen tomado de PubMed (NCBI) para el registro citado, en el idioma original. La versión de referencia es la de la publicación original.
El resumen se deja sin traducir para conservar la redacción original de los autores.
Síntesis
This single-center retrospective study of Impella-supported adults (19 on two standardized heparin protocols, 14 on patient-specific regimens) found similar time to therapeutic range (15.5 vs 12 hours) between protocols; no confirmed pump thrombosis occurred, but 42% of all patients experienced major bleeding.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro comparó dos protocolos de heparin para la anticoagulación de pacientes con dispositivos de asistencia ventricular percutánea Impella, encontrando un tiempo similar para alcanzar el rango terapéutico entre los protocolos y ningún evento de trombosis confirmado, pero una tasa notablemente alta de sangrado mayor (42% de todos los pacientes), y concluyendo que el grado óptimo de anticoagulación para reducir el sangrado sigue sin definirse. Para ASH, esto documenta lo difícil que es el control preciso de la anticoagulación incluso con heparin en un entorno de dispositivos estrechamente monitorizados; el tipo de necesidad no satisfecha que sostiene el interés en mecanismos antitrombóticos alternativos y más predecibles, como los péptidos inhibidores directos de la trombina caracterizados en el secretoma de Hirudo medicinalis/verbana. Advertencia honesta: se trata de una cohorte retrospectiva de un solo centro y de tamaño reducido (19 pacientes) sin contenido alguno de terapia con sanguijuelas; sus hallazgos son únicamente generadores de hipótesis, y ASH lo cita estrictamente como ilustración de los desafíos de la anticoagulación en el mundo real, no como respaldo para ningún tratamiento derivado de sanguijuelas.
Citación
Anticoagulation Management for Impella Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: An Analysis of a Single-Center Experience.
Wood E et al. · The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2020
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Investigación relacionada
Más estudios revisados por pares en la categoría «Ensayos clínicos».
- Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
- Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
- Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
- Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
- Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
- Investigación de los efectos terapéuticos del tratamiento con sanguijuelas medicinales sobre la lesión por isquemia-reperfusión de la extremidad inferior — Ünal K et al. (2026)
- Efficacy of Medicinal Leech Therapy in Diverse Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Study from Azerbaijan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
- HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
- Hirudoterapia en la cicatrización de heridas — Nair H et al. (2022)
- Improvement of patient care through hirudotherapy and the management of leeches from their reception to their disposal in France — Vaesken C et al. (2023)
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: 28 de mayo de 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026