Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Pharmacologic prevention of acute ischemic complications of coronary angioplasty

Review published in Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis (1997)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewDesarrollo de fármacosWheeldon N · Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis, 1997

Abstract

The risk of acute coronary occlusion following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has remained high despite the traditional use of heparin and aspirin. Interest has focused on newer strategies for preventing intracoronary thrombus formation, which is an important mechanism of abrupt vessel closure. Pretreatment with thrombolytic agents has failed vigorous testing in double-blind trials. Retrospective and observational studies have indicated that pretreatment with intravenous heparin is of benefit in patients with unstable symptoms, but prolonged infusion after angioplasty increases bleeding complications without improving outcomes. Subcutaneous heparin may be safer, but has not proved more effective. Oral dipyridamole has shown no advantage over aspirin, although there is evidence to suggest a benefit when given intravenously. Direct thrombin inhibitors (such as hirudin and hirulog) are associated with fewer early complications compared with heparin, but have yielded no apparent long-term benefit. The use of the antiplatelet drug ticlopidine is increasing, although long-term data are lacking. A great deal of recent interest has focused on newer antiplatelet agents, particularly the glycoprotein IIB/IIIa receptor inhibitor c7E3 Fab. In a large-scale trial, c7E3 significantly reduced the 30-day rate of mortality and cardiac events, and these benefits were maintained at 6 mo. This drug, unlike other antiplatelet agents, inhibits the final common pathway of platelet aggregation, which influences not only acute closure but has lasting effects for at least 6 mo. This may reflect a reduction in restenosis, although this remains to be proven. This article gives a brief overview of the pharmacologic agents available for the prophylaxis and treatment of acute ischemic complications of PTCA.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAbciximabAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAntibodies, MonoclonalAspirinConstriction, PathologicCoronary DiseaseFibrinolytic AgentsHeparinHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsThrombosis

Resumen

The risk of acute coronary occlusion following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has remained high despite the traditional use of heparin and aspirin.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This review surveys pharmacologic strategies for preventing acute ischemic complications of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), covering aspirin, heparin, thrombolytics, ticlopidine, and newer antiplatelet agents. Direct thrombin inhibitors hirudin and hirulog are noted as showing fewer early complications compared with heparin, though the abstract states they yielded "no apparent long-term benefit." The review focuses primarily on the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor c7E3 Fab as the most promising advance. This article is of indirect relevance to ASH's domain as it contextualizes hirudin within the broader antithrombotic pharmacotherapy landscape for interventional cardiology. The main caveat is that this is a review with no original data, and hirudin is mentioned only briefly among multiple agents; the abstract provides no specific trial results, study designs, or leech-related context for hirudin.

Citación

Pharmacologic prevention of acute ischemic complications of coronary angioplasty

Wheeldon N · Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis, 1997

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.