Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in arthroscopic surgery
Narrative review published in Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja (2013)
Resumen
The prophylaxis and epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following major orthopaedic procedures has been widely discussed in the world literature. Significantly less attention in the recent years has been paid to antithrombotic prophylaxis following arthroscopic procedures. In the past few years numerous controversies have developed as a result of contradictory guidelines advocated by various centres. Clinical studies involving prospective patient groups result in guidelines being published by orthopaedic associations. The guidelines issued by the Ame-rican College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) are the most influential. The latest edition of the guidelines was published in 2012. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is a British centre which issues guidelines for antithrombotic prophylaxis. The latest version of the guidelines is the Clinical Guidelines (CG) 92, dated 2010. Polish guidelines were developed by a working group headed by Prof. Krystyna Zawilska. The Polish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (PSOT) has not endorsed or recommended the guidelines put forward by the Working Group in 2012, so the PSOT guidelines are valid regarding orthopaedics and arthroscopic procedures. The comparison of international and Polish guidelines indicates a considerable discrepancy between the approaches to antithrombotic prophylaxis in arthroscopic procedures. From the viewpoint of an orthopaedist it is most important to select a prophylactic procedure appropriate for a specific patient. It is necessary to explain the need of prophylaxis to the patient, assess the risk factors of thrombosis and employ reliable tools, such as Wells' score. Pharmacological prophylaxis is well-known and widely used in arthroscopic procedures in Polish centres. However, it is also important to implement mechanical prophylactic measures, which are neglected or used to a limited extent in numerous centres. In recent years, American researchers conducted studies of large groups of patients with regard to the prophylaxis and incidence of VTE following arthroscopic procedures of the knee, hip and shoulder. The incidence of VTE following knee, hip and shoulder arthroscopy was 0.42%, 3.7% and 0.31%, respectively. The findings of the study support the validity of the guidelines issued by the American College of Chest Physicians in 2012.
Resumen tomado de PubMed (NCBI) para el registro citado, en el idioma original. La versión de referencia es la de la publicación original.
El resumen se deja sin traducir para conservar la redacción original de los autores.
Síntesis
This review compares international and Polish guidelines on venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after arthroscopic surgery, finding considerable discrepancies, and reports VTE incidences of 0.42% for knee, 3.7% for hip and 0.31% for shoulder arthroscopy, supporting ACCP 2012 guidance.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta revisión analiza la profilaxis del tromboembolismo venoso (VTE) tras cirugía artroscópica, comparando guías internacionales (ACCP 2012, NICE CG92), señalando discrepancias entre las recomendaciones nacionales y citando incidencias reportadas de VTE de 0.42 por ciento, 3.7 por ciento y 0.31 por ciento tras artroscopia de rodilla, cadera y hombro, respectivamente. Su conexión con la hirudoterapia es tangencial: se refiere a la tromboprofilaxis farmacológica sistémica y mecánica en pacientes ortopédicos, un problema clínico diferente a la indicación de congestión venosa local donde se utilizan sanguijuelas medicinales, y el resumen no hace referencia a sanguijuelas ni a hirudin. ASH debe tratarlo como un contexto general de anticoagulación y prevención de trombosis en lugar de evidencia de hirudoterapia. Al ser una revisión narrativa, resume las guías existentes y las incidencias reportadas en lugar de generar nuevos datos de resultados.
Citación
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in arthroscopic surgery.
Bryll et al. · Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja, 2013
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Investigación relacionada
Más estudios revisados por pares en la categoría «Ensayos clínicos».
- Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
- Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
- Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
- Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
- Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
- Investigación de los efectos terapéuticos del tratamiento con sanguijuelas medicinales sobre la lesión por isquemia-reperfusión de la extremidad inferior — Ünal K et al. (2026)
- Efficacy of Medicinal Leech Therapy in Diverse Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Study from Azerbaijan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
- HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
- Hirudoterapia en la cicatrización de heridas — Nair H et al. (2022)
- Improvement of patient care through hirudotherapy and the management of leeches from their reception to their disposal in France — Vaesken C et al. (2023)
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: 28 de mayo de 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026