Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Tumor and Flap Reconstruction Volumes and Functional Outcomes after Glossectomy

Research article published in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery (2026)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportEnsayos clínicosWu et al. · JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2026

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Oral tongue is the most common subsite of oral cavity cancers, and incidence is increasing. Tongue resection is associated with morbidity, affecting speech, swallowing, and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of tumor volume and extent of tongue resection with functional outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgical resection of the oral tongue at a tertiary-level academic institution between 2014 and 2025 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Demographic, tumor, treatment, and postoperative outcomes measured with validated instruments were identified. EXPOSURE: Partial or hemiglossectomy (PG) vs total or subtotal glossectomy (TG). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) score of 3 or lower, indicating gastrostomy tube dependency. Multivariable analysis assessed risk factors for the primary outcome. Radiographic volumetric analysis of tumor, tongue, and flap volumes was performed. Linear and nonlinear regression modeling assessed the association between measured volumes and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Of 357 patients (median age 62.3 [range, 18-95] years; 51.0% female), 88.2% [n=315] had PG and 11.8% [n=42] had TG. Tumors were classified as T1 or T2 in 71.2% of patients (254 of 357) and as T3 or T4 in 28.8% (103 of 357). Free-flap reconstruction was performed in 150 (42.0%) patients, and 186 (52.1%) received adjuvant radiation. Median follow-up was 36.1 (IQR, 18.2-65.6) months. The TG cohort had worse median FOIS score (2 [IQR, 1-5] vs 5 [IQR, 4-6]), aspiration (3 [IQR, 2-5] vs 1 [IQR, 1-2]), tongue strength (17 [IQR, 15-20] vs 36 [IQR, 25-42]), tongue range of motion (16 [IQR, 0-25] vs 88 [IQR, 63-100]), speech understandability (50 [IQR, 50-75] vs 100 [IQR, 100-100]), and patient-reported quality of life (67 [IQR, 60-71] vs 77 [IQR, 65-86]). On multivariable analysis, older age, current or former smoking status, use of free flap, TG, and greater resection volume were associated with FOIS score of 3 or lower. Preoperative tumor fraction greater than 31% and resection volume fraction greater than 67% were associated with the outcome of FOIS score of 3 or lower, indicating gastrostomy tube dependence. Preoperative tumor fraction greater than 26% and resection volume fraction greater than 58% were associated with understandability of speech score lower than 75, indicating poorly intelligible speech. On nonlinear regression analysis, tongue volume restoration to 100% of baseline value was associated with improved oral intake. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, volumetric analysis demonstrated that tumor, resection, flap, and total tongue volumes were associated with speech and swallow outcomes. These findings suggest that quantitative knowledge of incremental changes in tongue resection and restoration may contribute to improved preoperative counseling and functional outcomes.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansGlossectomyFemaleTongue NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAgedAged, 80 and overAdultSurgical FlapsAdolescent

Resumen

Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Esta cohorte retrospectiva de 357 pacientes con carcinoma de células escamosas de lengua oral (2014-2025) utilizó imágenes volumétricas para vincular el tamaño del tumor, la extensión de la glossectomía y el volumen del colgajo reconstruido con los resultados del habla y la deglución, hallando que la glossectomía total/subtotal y las mayores fracciones de volumen de resección se asociaron con puntuaciones funcionales peores y dependencia de sonda de gastrostomía, mientras que la restauración del volumen lingual hacia el valor basal se correlacionó con una mejora de la ingesta oral. Para ASH, la conexión se establece a través de la reconstrucción de cabeza y cuello mediante colgajo libre, realizada en el 42% de esta cohorte: dichos colgajos libres son un escenario reconocido de congestión venosa posoperatoria en el cual las sanguijuelas medicinales se utilizan a veces de forma adjunta para salvar un colgajo comprometido, por lo que este estudio esclarece los riesgos reconstructivos y la importancia de la viabilidad del colgajo que motivan el rescate con sanguijuelas. La advertencia es que se trata de una cohorte retrospectiva centrada en los resultados funcionales y la predicción volumétrica, no en las complicaciones del colgajo ni en la terapia con sanguijuelas, temas que no aborda en absoluto; únicamente proporciona contexto procedimental y de resultados, y no ofrece evidencia directa sobre la hirudoterapia.

Citación

Tumor and Flap Reconstruction Volumes and Functional Outcomes after Glossectomy.

Wu et al. · JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2026

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.