Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in bivalirudin-treated patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: The BRIGHT-4 trial
Randomized controlled trial (post-hoc) published in Cardiovasc Revasc Med (2025)
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The optimal antiplatelet agent regimen in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) with bivalirudin anticoagulation is uncertain. This analysis sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI with radial artery access and bivalirudin anticoagulation. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis compared bivalirudin plus ticagrelor with bivalirudin plus clopidogrel in 3009 BRIGHT-4 patients that were treated with PPCI. The primary endpoint was all-cause death or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3-5 bleeding occurring within 30 days. RESULTS: The 30-day all-cause death or BARC types 3-5 bleeding occurred in 2.0 % of patients treated with ticagrelor vs. 3.9 % of patients treated with clopidogrel (HR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.29 to 0.89; P = 0.02), driven by a reduction in all-cause death with ticagrelor (1.9 % vs. 3.7 %; P = 0.02) with no difference in BARC types 3-5 bleeding (0.1 % vs. 0.3 %; P = 0.34), although BARC type 2 bleeding was increased with ticagrelor (2.7 % vs. 1.2 %; P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between two groups in risk of stent thrombosis and composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI treated with PPCI, the risk of the composite of all-cause mortality and BARC types 3-5 bleeding at 30 days was lower with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel on a background of bivalirudin, without an increase in stent thrombosis and major bleedings.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Post-hoc analysis of 3009 STEMI patients in the BRIGHT-4 RCT comparing ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel on a bivalirudin background during primary PCI. Ticagrelor reduced 30-day all-cause death/major bleeding composite without increasing stent thrombosis.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este análisis post-hoc comparó ticagrelor frente a clopidogrel en 3.009 pacientes con STEMI sometidos a intervención coronaria percutánea primaria con anticoagulación con bivalirudina y acceso radial, extraídos de la población de pacientes del estudio BRIGHT-4. El desenlace compuesto de muerte por todas las causas o sangrado BARC tipos 3–5 a los 30 días fue menor con ticagrelor (2,0 % frente a 3,9 %; HR 0,51; P=0,02), impulsado por una mortalidad reducida, aunque el sangrado BARC tipo 2 aumentó. El resumen no menciona la hirudina, las sanguijuelas ni la terapia con sanguijuelas, y no puede establecerse ninguna conexión defendible con la hirudoterapia o el secretoma de la sanguijuela a partir de este artículo. Este estudio no es relevante para el dominio de ASH.
Citación
Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in bivalirudin-treated patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: The BRIGHT-4 trial.
Li Y et al. · Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, 2025
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026