Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

The possible effects of iron loss from bloodletting on mortality from pneumonia in the nineteenth century

Historical / methodology analysis published in J Clin Epidemiol (2021)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewEnsayos clínicosBrabin B et al. · Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate iron losses and disease severity following 19th century bloodletting in patients with pneumonia. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Benefits of bloodletting in pneumonia patients were contested during the 19th century. Although large blood volumes during infection were removed there was no systematic data collection assessing efficacy and knowledge of iron composition of blood was rudimentary. This observational analysis of historical data quantifies iron losses in pneumonia cases in relation to disease severity. RESULTS: Based on one detailed case series average blood volume removed for survivors was 830 mL (range 114-2272 mL), and mean recovery times were shorter in patients bled within 2 days of illness (P < 0.001). Average iron removed was 446 mg with phlebotomy done ≤2 days of illness presentation and 347 mg after >2 days of illness (P = 0.012). Across several European hospitals average case fatality in pneumonia patients receiving phlebotomy was higher than in those treated without phlebotomy (19.9% vs. 12.8%, OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.38-1.74, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Variable efficacy for bloodletting could at least in part be explained by altered iron status.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeHistorical ArticleJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAdultBloodlettingFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHumansIronIron DeficienciesMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia

Resumen

Quantitative analysis of 19th-century pneumonia bloodletting showing average 446 mg iron removed per phlebotomy and 19.9% case fatality versus 12.8% without phlebotomy.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This historical review analyzes iron losses resulting from 19th-century phlebotomy in pneumonia patients, finding that average blood volume removed was significant and that case fatality was higher in patients who received phlebotomy versus those who did not. The study examines historical blood-removal practices and their physiological consequences, specifically focusing on phlebotomy. Its relevance to ASH's domain is strictly indirect, as the abstract exclusively discusses phlebotomy and never mentions leeches or hirudotherapy. The connection is limited only to the shared historical concept of blood-removal therapeutics, and no direct link to leeches can be drawn from the provided abstract.

Citación

The possible effects of iron loss from bloodletting on mortality from pneumonia in the nineteenth century.

Brabin B et al. · Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021

Contexto clínico relacionado

Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.