Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO
Research article published in Journal of clinical anesthesia (2021)
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Viscoelastic point-of-care (POC) tests are commonly used to provide prompt diagnosis of coagulopathy and allow targeted treatments in bleeding patients on ECMO. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care (POC) testing for anticoagulation management in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies evaluating the use of thromboelastography- or thromboelastometry-guided algorithms, anti-factor Xa and platelet function testing were selected after screening the literature from July 1975 to January 2020. SETTING: Patients on ECMO support. PATIENTS: Anticoagulation management on ECMO patients. INTERVENTIONS: Rotational thromboelastometry, thromboelastography, alone or combined with platelet function testing. Trials monitoring the anticoagulation effects during ECMO using an anti-factor Xa assay were included in the systematic review. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes were bleeding events, surgical revisions, thrombosis events and ECMO circuit change/failure. Secondary outcomes were blood-product transfusions, cerebrovascular accidents, mortality on ECMO, ECMO duration, intensive care unit and hospital discharge rates, and in-hospital mortality. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-one trials enrolling 1684 participants were included in the systematic review. Four trials enrolling 547 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The use of a POC testing device resulted in improved detection of surgical bleeding (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.94, I2 = 0%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.02). The use of POC-guided algorithms did not affect bleeding (RR:0.78, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.04, I2 = 47%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.09), thrombosis events (RR:1.35, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.12, I2 = 37%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.19), or ECMO circuit/change (RR:0.90, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.71, I2 = 28%; χ2 test for heterogeneity, P = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Routine use of POC tests did not improve the main clinical outcomes beyond suggesting a diagnosis of surgical bleeding in ECMO patients.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta revisión sistemática y metaanálisis (31 ensayos en la revisión, 4 ensayos con 547 sujetos en el metaanálisis) evaluaron las pruebas viscoelásticas y relacionadas en el punto de atención (POC) para el manejo de la anticoagulación durante ECMO y encontraron que las pruebas POC rutinarias mejoraron la detección del sangrado quirúrgico, pero no redujeron significativamente el sangrado general, los eventos trombóticos o el cambio/fallo del circuito de ECMO. Esto es relevante para el panorama de la evidencia de la hirudoterapia de manera indirecta: se refiere al problema más amplio de equilibrar el sangrado frente a la coagulación en circuitos extracorpóreos donde la heparin es el estándar, la misma tensión hemostática que motiva el interés en los DTI y el linaje de anticoagulantes derivados de sanguijuelas (p. ej., hirudin/bivalirudin) en la investigación de la anticoagulación. La advertencia es que este es un metaanálisis de estrategias de monitoreo en ECMO, no de la terapia con sanguijuelas o fármacos derivados de ellas, y el análisis agrupado se basó en solo unos pocos ensayos.
Citación
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO.
Jiritano et al. · Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2021
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026