Supremacy of the pulse within the medicine of the enlightenment
Historical review published in Intern Med J (2025)
Abstract
For the minority of the British sick poor, the healing process was conducted as an in-patient in one of the emerging British voluntary hospitals and infirmaries. But those with fevers and contagious diseases were excluded from admission. During the subsequent truncated physical examination, the character of the pulse received especially close attention. The diagnostic regard paid to the pulse assumed the same pre-eminent consideration as bloodletting was within the therapeutic armamentarium. Fever was not considered a symptom within British medicine during the 18th century; rather, it was regarded as a disease sui generis. Indeed, the pulse was regarded as the most reliable guide to the existence of a febrile illness, and variations in the pulse character directed the physician to adopt certain therapeutic modalities. The rapid bounding pulse was a signal of an inflammatory fever, whilst slow low amplitude pulses inferred a typhus-like aetiology. The importance of the pulse to the 18th century practitioner's understanding of sickness, whereby its pre-eminence was gradually replaced by clinical thermometry adopted fitfully during the mid-19th century.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Historical review of pulse-based diagnosis in Enlightenment-era medicine including bloodletting and leech-therapy traditions.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este artículo histórico examina el papel preeminente de la exploración del pulso en la medicina británica de los siglos XVIII y XIX, particularmente en el diagnóstico y manejo de la enfermedad febril, señalando que la sangría era una modalidad terapéutica primordial guiada por el carácter del pulso. Un pulso rápido y amplio señalizaba fiebre inflamatoria que justificaba una intervención terapéutica. Para ASH, este artículo aporta contexto histórico para la práctica más amplia de la sangría, dentro de la cual la hirudoterapia era un enfoque. ADVERTENCIA: no se mencionan sanguijuelas ni hirudoterapia; la sangría referenciada es flebotomía general, y la relevancia con el secretoma de la sanguijuela es puramente histórica e indirecta.
Citación
Supremacy of the pulse within the medicine of the enlightenment.
Short et al. · Internal medicine journal, 2025
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026