Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Supremacy of the pulse within the medicine of the enlightenment

Historical review published in Intern Med J (2025)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportEnsayos clínicosShort et al. · Internal medicine journal, 2025

Abstract

For the minority of the British sick poor, the healing process was conducted as an in-patient in one of the emerging British voluntary hospitals and infirmaries. But those with fevers and contagious diseases were excluded from admission. During the subsequent truncated physical examination, the character of the pulse received especially close attention. The diagnostic regard paid to the pulse assumed the same pre-eminent consideration as bloodletting was within the therapeutic armamentarium. Fever was not considered a symptom within British medicine during the 18th century; rather, it was regarded as a disease sui generis. Indeed, the pulse was regarded as the most reliable guide to the existence of a febrile illness, and variations in the pulse character directed the physician to adopt certain therapeutic modalities. The rapid bounding pulse was a signal of an inflammatory fever, whilst slow low amplitude pulses inferred a typhus-like aetiology. The importance of the pulse to the 18th century practitioner's understanding of sickness, whereby its pre-eminence was gradually replaced by clinical thermometry adopted fitfully during the mid-19th century.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleHistorical Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansHistory, 18th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyFeverPulseUnited Kingdom

Resumen

Historical review of pulse-based diagnosis in Enlightenment-era medicine including bloodletting and leech-therapy traditions.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This historical article examines the pre-eminent role of pulse examination in 18th and 19th century British medicine, particularly in the diagnosis and management of febrile illness, noting that bloodletting was a primary therapeutic modality guided by pulse character. A rapid bounding pulse signaled inflammatory fever warranting therapeutic intervention. For ASH, this article provides historical context for the broader practice of bloodletting, within which hirudotherapy was one approach. CAVEAT: No leeches or hirudotherapy are mentioned; the bloodletting referenced is general phlebotomy, and the relevance to the leech secretome is purely historical and indirect.

Citación

Supremacy of the pulse within the medicine of the enlightenment.

Short et al. · Internal medicine journal, 2025

Contexto clínico relacionado

Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.