Comparison of Lymphatic Drainage of the Lower Limbs After Soft Tissue Reconstruction by Microvascular Muscle Flap Versus Fasciocutaneous Flaps
Research article published in Annals of plastic surgery (2023)
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Complex traumatic injuries of the lower limb are increasingly being salvaged. The common long-term morbidity includes secondary lymphedema. The role of microvascular flaps is often discussed for lymph flow restoration. However, the differential effect of using muscle flap versus fasciocutaneous flap in the lower-limb trauma to avoid secondary lymphedema is not studied. METHODS: Forty patients who underwent microvascular flap reconstruction were reviewed retrospectively to obtain data regarding clinical demographics and surgical procedure. Assessment for presence of clinical lymphedema was done. The lymphatic drainage in all these patients was assessed by 99mTc lymphoscintigraphy. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients included in the study, group A (n = 23) underwent muscle-based free flap reconstruction, and group B (n = 17) had fasciocutaneous flaps. Clinical lymphedema was present in 21 patients, of which 18 were of group A and 3 of group B. On lymphoscintigraphy, 14 patients had either partial or complete obstruction in the reconstructed lower limb, 11 in group A and 3 in group B. All of them (n = 14) were found to have associated clinical lymphedema. The association of clinical lymphedema (P < 0.001) and obstructive pattern on lymphoscintigraphy (P < 0.05) with muscle flaps was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: With the advancement in surgery and techniques, not only salvageability but also stable and morbidity free outcomes are the goals. Fasciocutaneous flaps may have better lymphatic outcomes than the muscle-based flaps, and the criteria for lower-limb reconstruction can be reformed to include simultaneous soft tissue and lymphatic reconstruction.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio retrospectivo de 40 pacientes con traumatismos de extremidad inferior comparó el drenaje linfático después de la reconstrucción con colgajos musculares microvasculares versus colgajos fasciocutáneos, utilizando evaluación clínica y liniscintigrafía con 99mTc, y encontró que el linfedema clínico y los patrones liniscintigráficos obstructivos estaban significativamente más asociados con los colgajos musculares, lo que sugiere que los colgajos fasciocutáneos podrían ofrecer mejores resultados linfáticos. Su relevancia para la hirudoterapia es limitada e indirecta: se refiere a resultados linfáticos (no venosos) de la reconstrucción con colgajos, mientras que el papel establecido de la sanguijuela medicinal es en la congestión venosa, por lo que el vínculo es el entorno compartido de microcirugía y colgajos en lugar del mecanismo que abordan las sanguijuelas. Como una comparación retrospectiva de 40 pacientes, es hipótesis generadora sobre la elección del colgajo y el linfedema, y no estudia ni se refiere a la terapia con sanguijuelas.
Citación
Comparison of Lymphatic Drainage of the Lower Limbs After Soft Tissue Reconstruction by Microvascular Muscle Flap Versus Fasciocutaneous Flaps.
Cordelia et al. · Annals of plastic surgery, 2023
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026