Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

A randomized evaluation of simulation training on performance of vascular anastomosis on a high-fidelity in vivo model: the role of deliberate practice.

Research article published in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2011)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialEnsayos clínicosPrice et al. · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2011

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is mounting evidence supporting the benefit of surgical skills practice in a simulated environment. However, the use of simulation in cardiac surgical training has been limited. The purpose of the current trial was to examine the effect of independent and deliberate simulator practice, during nonclinical time, on the performance of an end-to-side microvascular anastomosis in an in vivo model. METHODS: This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial received institutional review board approval. Thirty-nine first- and second-year surgical trainees were randomized to an expert-guided tutorial on a procedural trainer or to the expert-guided tutorial combined with self-directed practice on the same procedural trainer. Self-directed practice consisted of 10 anastomoses performed on the procedural trainer: a low-fidelity, commercially available bench model using 4-mm polytetrafluoroethylene graft as simulated blood vessel. Two weeks after the tutorial, subjects performed an end-to-side anastomosis in a live porcine model, under realistic operating room conditions. Assessment of outcomes was performed by 2 blinded, expert observers, uings validated measurements of technical skill. The primary outcome was the score on the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scale. Secondary outcomes included an anastomosis-specific end-product evaluation and time to completion. Statistical analysis was conducted using nonparametric, univariate techniques. RESULTS: Compared with residents who received expert-guided simulator training alone, those who in addition practiced on a simulator independently after hours scored significantly higher on the OSATS scale (23.7 ± 4.7 vs 18.5 ± 3.9, P = .003). Residents who practiced independently also scored significantly higher on the end-product evaluation (11.4 ± 3.2 vs 8.9 ± 2.1, P = .02) and performed the anastomosis significantly faster (777 seconds vs 977 seconds, P = .04). Interrater reliability was high between the expert observers (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Residents who had the opportunity for self-directed simulator practice performed an end-to-side anastomosis more adeptly, more quickly, and with a higher quality end product. The results of this randomized trial suggest that independent training on a procedural trainer did transfer to improved performance in an operating room environment. Simulator training should be incorporated into cardiovascular surgical curricula and residents should have access to this modality for independent after-hours practice to improve operating room performance.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAnastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsClinical CompetenceHumansMicrosurgeryModels, AnimalSingle-Blind MethodSwineVascular Surgical Procedures

Resumen

A randomized evaluation of simulation training on performance of vascular anastomosis on a high-fidelity in vivo model: the role of deliberate practice.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este ensayo controlado aleatorizado examinó el efecto de la práctica independiente y deliberada con simulador sobre el desempeño de la anastomosis microvascular término-lateral en un modelo porcino in vivo entre 39 residentes de primer y segundo año de cirugía. El estudio encontró que los residentes que combinaron un tutorial guiado por un experto con práctica autodirigida con simulador obtuvieron puntuaciones significativamente más altas en la escala de Evaluación Objetiva Estructurada de la Habilidad Técnica (OSATS) (23,7 vs. 18,5; P = 0,003), en la evaluación del producto final (11,4 vs. 8,9; P = 0,02), y realizaron el procedimiento más rápido (777 vs. 977 segundos; P = 0,04) en comparación con quienes recibieron solo el tutorial. El resumen aborda el entrenamiento con simulador quirúrgico y la transferencia de habilidades al quirófano. No contiene ninguna mención de sanguijuelas, hirudoterapia, manejo de la congestión venosa ni del secretoma de las sanguijuelas, por lo que no se respalda su relevancia para la Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia.

Citación

A randomized evaluation of simulation training on performance of vascular anastomosis on a high-fidelity in vivo model: the role of deliberate practice.

Price et al. · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2011

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.