Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support: Pathophysiology of Pediatric Hemostasis and Available Options

Review published in Front Cardiovasc Med (2021)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Narrative reviewDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosGiorni C et al. · Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021

Abstract

Pediatric mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is considered a strategy for heart failure management as a bridge to recovery and transplantation or as a destination therapy. The final outcome is significantly impacted by the number of complications that may occur during MCS. Children on ventricular assist devices (VADs) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are at high risk for bleeding and thrombotic complications that are managed through anticoagulation. The first detailed guideline in pediatric VADs (Edmonton Anticoagulation and Platelet Inhibition Protocol) was based on conventional antithrombotic drugs, such as unfractionated heparin (UFH) and warfarin. UFH is the first-line anticoagulant in pediatric MCS, although its profile is not considered optimal in pediatric setting. The broad variation in heparin doses among children is associated with frequent occurrence of cerebrovascular accidents, bleeding, and thrombocytopenia. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) have been utilized as alternative strategies to heparin. Since 2018, bivalirudin has become the chosen anticoagulant in the long-term therapy of patients undergoing MCS implantation, according to the most recent protocols shared in North America. This article provides a review of the non-traditional anticoagulation strategies utilized in pediatric MCS, focusing on pharmacodynamics, indications, doses, and monitoring aspects of bivalirudin. Moreover, it exposes the efforts and the collaborations among different specialized centers, which are committed to an ongoing learning in order to minimize major complications in this special pediatric population. Further prospective trials regarding DTIs in a pediatric MCS setting are necessary and in specific well-designed randomized control trials between UFH and bivalirudin. To conclude, based on the reported literature, the clinical use of the bivalirudin in pediatric MCS seems to be a value added in controlling and maybe reducing thromboembolic complications. Further research is necessary to confirm all the results provided by this literature review.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview

Resumen

Review of non-traditional anticoagulants in pediatric MCS focusing on bivalirudin pharmacodynamics, indications, doses and monitoring with bivalirudin now the chosen anticoagulant in long-term MCS therapy.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Esta revisión examina las estrategias de anticoagulación en el soporte circulatorio mecánico pediátrico, centrándose en la farmacodinámica, la dosificación y la monitorización de la bivalirudina como inhibidor directo de la trombina alternativo a la heparina no fraccionada (HNF) para niños en DAV y ECMO. El resumen describe las complicaciones hemorrágicas y trombóticas de la terapia convencional con heparina y la creciente adopción de la bivalirudina desde 2018, al tiempo que hace un llamado a realizar ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA) prospectivos que comparen HNF y bivalirudina. No existe ninguna conexión defendible con la hirudoterapia, la terapia con sanguijuelas o el secretoma de la sanguijuela basándose en este resumen, que no menciona la hirudina, las sanguijuelas ni ningún derivado de ellas. Como artículo de revisión, sintetiza la literatura existente en lugar de presentar nuevos datos primarios, y sus conclusiones están limitadas por la calidad y el alcance de la evidencia revisada.

Citación

Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support: Pathophysiology of Pediatric Hemostasis and Available Options.

Giorni C et al. · Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.