Oropharyngeal Free Flap Inset With a Single Port Robot: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION: Traditional oropharyngeal resection may require lip-split mandibulotomy approach (LSMA) which risks high morbidity. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) through the oral pharynx mitigates these risks. Free flap (FF) inset following resection is challenging and may require open approaches, negating the benefits of TORS resection. We present our case series utilizing the single port (SP) robot for FF inset, which has improved visualization and functionality compared with a multiport robot. METHODS: A retrospective review of robotic FF inset following TORS using the SP from 2021 to 2022. Patient and tumor characteristics as well as operative and postoperative details were gathered. RESULTS: Five cases were performed with an average age of 62.4 (50-78) years. Radial forearm FF was used in three cases and anterolateral thigh flap in two. Mean operative time was 528 (423-742) minutes with an average ischemia time of 156.6 (124-198) min. Average functional oral intake score was 5.8 (3-7) out of 7. There were no FF losses or wound healing issues at an average of 17.6 (7-27) months follow-up. CONCLUSION: Robotic FF inset following TORS is feasible with the SP robot already used by ENTs for resection. The platform has 6 mm instruments capable of 7 degrees of freedom, use of a third arm for dynamic retraction, and the ability to assume a "cobra-like" position to leverage a tight space. This gives plastic surgeons an opportunity to decrease the complication profile from FF inset that would otherwise require potentially morbid exposures.

Resumen tomado de PubMed (NCBI) para el registro citado, en el idioma original. La versión de referencia es la de la publicación original.

El resumen se deja sin traducir para conservar la redacción original de los autores.

A retrospective series of five patients undergoing single-port robotic free flap inset after transoral robotic oropharyngeal resection found no flap losses or wound-healing problems at a mean follow-up of 17.6 months, with mean operative time 528 minutes.

Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica

Más estudios revisados por pares en la categoría «Ensayos clínicos».

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigación de los efectos terapéuticos del tratamiento con sanguijuelas medicinales sobre la lesión por isquemia-reperfusión de la extremidad inferior — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Efficacy of Medicinal Leech Therapy in Diverse Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Study from Azerbaijan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudoterapia en la cicatrización de heridas — Nair H et al. (2022)
• Improvement of patient care through hirudotherapy and the management of leeches from their reception to their disposal in France — Vaesken C et al. (2023)

Ver toda la investigación analizada por la ASH →