Learning microvascular anastomosis: Analysis of practice patterns.
Research article published in Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia (2021)
Abstract
Performing a successful microsurgical vascular anastomosis (MVA) is challenging and requires lots of practice. However, the most efficient practice protocol is yet to be found. We aimed to compare and analyze two major practice patterns for fine motor tasks as applied to learning MVA: distributed and mass practice protocols. Ten neurosurgeons with comparable experience in microsurgery (but no experience in vascular anastomosis) were randomized to practice MVA either using a distributed (1 session/day) or a mass practice (6 sessions/day) protocol. A total of 24 sessions of practice and 2 recall test sessions were given. Anastomosis score, time to complete a single stitch and the total time to complete an anastomosis were recorded. Mass practice protocol caused a clear fatigue effect observed toward the end of each mass practice trial block. Statistical comparison using one-way analysis of variance showed significantly higher anastomosis scores and shorter times to place a single stitch as well as to complete the anastomosis in distributed practice group for the last 3 acquisition practice trials, and the 2 recall tests (p < 0.05). The relative advantage of the distributed practice protocol could be attributed to forgetting/spacing effect. Although mass practice protocol resulted in worse performance, it still showed a gradual improvement trend in performance from beginning to the end. Therefore, certain adjustments to a mass practice protocol (such as increasing the number of practice blocks) could potentially lead to an eventual performance level comparable to a distributed protocol. This point is a subject of further investigation.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Learning microvascular anastomosis: Analysis of practice patterns.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este pequeño estudio aleatorio comparó protocolos de práctica distribuida (1 sesión/día) versus práctica masiva (6 sesiones/día) para aprender la anastomosis vascular microquirúrgica en diez neurocirujanos, encontrando que el grupo de práctica distribuida obtuvo puntuaciones de anastomosis significativamente más altas y tiempos de sutura y de finalización más rápidos en los ensayos de adquisición finales y ambas pruebas de recuerdo (p<0,05). Es relevante para la hirudoterapia porque la cirugía microvascular/reconstructiva es el principal escenario clínico moderno para la aplicación de sanguijuelas medicinales: se aplican sanguijuelas para aliviar la congestión venosa en injertos, replantes y transferencias de tejido libre cuya supervivencia depende de la calidad de *exactamente estas* anastomosis. Por lo tanto, un mejor entrenamiento quirúrgico se sitúa por encima de los escenarios de salvamento donde se despliega la hirudoterapia. Nota honesta: este es un ensayo preliminar de adquisición de habilidades con solo diez participantes y sin resultados en pacientes, y no estudia sanguijuelas ni hirudoterapia en absoluto, solo el entrenamiento de la cirugía que apoyan.
Citación
Learning microvascular anastomosis: Analysis of practice patterns.
Mokhtari et al. · Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2021
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026