Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Trends in parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor use in pediatric patients: analysis of a large administrative database

Research article published in Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (2014)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Observational studyDesarrollo de fármacosMoffett BS et al. · Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2014

Abstract

CONTEXT: Parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) may be used in pediatric patients with contraindications to heparin therapy, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Few data exist regarding the use of DTIs in pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the use of DTIs in pediatric patients, including monitoring strategies and bleeding complications. DESIGN: A retrospective descriptive study was designed and the Pediatric Health Information System database was queried from 2004 to 2011 for pediatric patients receiving a parenteral DTI. Patient demographic and hospital data, mortality, disease state, and procedure information (from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes) were collected from the query. DTI monitoring information was also collected. Patients were divided into 2 time periods (2004-2007, 2008-2011) to evaluate trends. RESULTS: Two hundred eight patients met study criteria (50.9% male, 64.4% white), and children (2-12 years of age) represented 34.6% of the population. Congenital heart disease was present in 43.8% and cardiovascular surgical procedure occurred in 28.4%. Argatroban was most commonly used (73.1%) and bivalirudin use increased (P < .001). Bleeding complications were present in 37.9% of patients and mortality was 19.7%. Bleeding complications were associated with lepirudin (62.5%) and argatroban (41.7%) more often as compared with bivalirudin (18.8%) (P < .001). Activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time were used more often in patients receiving argatroban and lepirudin in comparison with bivalirudin, and thrombin time was used more often in patients receiving lepirudin (P < .001). Activated clotting time use increased over time (5.1% versus 17.5%, P = .02). CONCLUSION: Pediatric use of DTIs is infrequent and occurs in patients with high morbidity and mortality.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeComparative StudyJournal ArticleMulticenter Study
Indexed MeSH termsAdolescentAge FactorsAntithrombinsArginineChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth Information SystemsHemorrhageHirudinsHumans

Resumen

Trends in parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor use in pediatric patients: analysis of a large administrative database.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este estudio descriptivo retrospectivo consultó una gran base de datos administrativa (Pediatric Health Information System, 2004–2011) para caracterizar el uso, las estrategias de monitorización y las complicaciones hemorrágicas de los inhibidores directos de la trombina por vía parenteral en 208 pacientes pediátricos. El argatrobán fue el más utilizado (73,1%), el uso de bivalirudina aumentó con el tiempo y la lepirudina se asoció con una tasa de complicaciones hemorrágicas del 62,5%. El resumen no menciona sanguijuelas, hirudina ni hirudoterapia, por lo que la relevancia para el ámbito de la ASH no queda establecida por este artículo. La población del estudio presentó una alta morbilidad y mortalidad general, y el resumen no aborda ninguna conexión derivada de sanguijuelas ni un contexto aplicado de hirudoterapia.

Citación

Trends in parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor use in pediatric patients: analysis of a large administrative database

Moffett BS et al. · Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2014

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.