Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Intravenous Direct Thrombin Inhibitors for Acute Venous Thromboembolism or Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia with Thrombosis in Children: A Systematic Review

Systematic review published in Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis (2024)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Systematic reviewDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosKiskaddon AL et al. · Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 2024

Abstract

Intravenous direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are used for thromboembolic disorders. This systematic review aims to characterize intravenous DTI agents, dosing, monitoring strategies (or use), bleeding, and mortality, in pediatric patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT). MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane's CENTRAL were searched from inception through July 2023. Case series, retrospective studies, and prospective studies providing per-patient or summary data for patients < 18 years of age with VTE or HITT treated with an intravenous DTI were included. Selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Sixteen studies (7 case reports, 1 case series, 5 retrospective studies, 3 prospective studies) with 85 patients were included. Target conditions included acute VTE in 54 (64%) and HITT in 31 (36%) patients. Bivalirudin, argatroban, and lepirudin were used in 52 (61%), 27 (32%), and 6 (7%) patients, respectively. Fifty-two (61%) patients received a bolus dose, and weighted mean infusion rates for bivalirudin, argatroban, and lepirudin were 0.2 mg/kg/hr, 1.2 mcg/kg/min, and 0.15 mg/kg/hr, respectively. The activated partial thromboplastin time was utilized for monitoring in 82 (96%) patients. Complete or partial thrombus resolution was reported in 53 (62%) patients, mortality in 6 (7%) patients, and bleeding complications in 14 (16%) patients. In this systematic review involving 85 pediatric patients treated with an intravenous DTI for acute VTE or HITT, bivalirudin was the most commonly utilized agent, with a rate of resolution over 60% despite a high acuity in the population studied. Prospective collaborative studies are warranted to establish optimal dosing and further characterize VTE and bleeding outcomes.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleSystematic Review
Indexed MeSH termsHumansThrombocytopeniaHeparinVenous ThromboembolismChildAntithrombinsThrombosisAcute DiseaseAdolescentFemaleMale

Resumen

Systematic review of 16 studies and 85 pediatric patients receiving bivalirudin (61%), argatroban (32%) or lepirudin (7%) for acute VTE or HIT with thrombosis; 62% achieved thrombus resolution with 16% bleeding complication rate.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This systematic review characterized intravenous direct thrombin inhibitor use in 85 pediatric patients with acute venous thromboembolism or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis, drawing on case reports, case series, retrospective, and prospective studies. Lepirudin was used in 6 patients (7%), while bivalirudin (61%) and argatroban (32%) were more common; complete or partial thrombus resolution occurred in 62% overall. The abstract does not describe lepirudin's relationship to hirudin or mention leeches. For ASH, the connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome is not supported by the abstract, which discusses these agents purely as direct thrombin inhibitors. The evidence base is observational, and prospective collaborative studies are warranted.

Citación

Intravenous Direct Thrombin Inhibitors for Acute Venous Thromboembolism or Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia with Thrombosis in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Kiskaddon AL et al. · Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 2024

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.