Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial

Randomized controlled trial published in Lancet (London, England) (2010)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialEnsayos clínicosIsmail-Beigi F et al. · Lancet (London, England), 2010

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycaemia is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes. We investigated whether reduction of blood glucose concentration decreases the rate of microvascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: ACCORD was a parallel-group, randomised trial done in 77 clinical sites in North America. People with diabetes, high HbA(1c) concentrations (>7.5%), and cardiovascular disease (or >or=2 cardiovascular risk factors) were randomly assigned by central randomisation to intensive (target haemoglobin A(1c) [HbA(1c)] of <6.0%) or standard (7.0-7.9%) glycaemic therapy. In this analysis, the prespecified composite outcomes were: dialysis or renal transplantation, high serum creatinine (>291.7 micromol/L), or retinal photocoagulation or vitrectomy (first composite outcome); or peripheral neuropathy plus the first composite outcome (second composite outcome). 13 prespecified secondary measures of kidney, eye, and peripheral nerve function were also assessed. Investigators and participants were aware of treatment group assignment. Analysis was done for all patients who were assessed for microvascular outcomes, on the basis of treatment assignment, irrespective of treatments received or compliance to therapies. ACCORD is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00000620. FINDINGS: 10 251 patients were randomly assigned, 5128 to the intensive glycaemia control group and 5123 to standard group. Intensive therapy was stopped before study end because of higher mortality in that group, and patients were transitioned to standard therapy. At transition, the first composite outcome was recorded in 443 of 5107 patients in the intensive group versus 444 of 5108 in the standard group (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88-1.14; p=1.00), and the second composite outcome was noted in 1591 of 5107 versus 1659 of 5108 (0.96, 0.89-1.02; p=0.19). Results were similar at study end (first composite outcome 556 of 5119 vs 586 of 5115 [HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85-1.07, p=0.42]; and second 1956 of 5119 vs 2046 of 5115, respectively [0.95, 0.89-1.01, p=0.12]). Intensive therapy did not reduce the risk of advanced measures of microvascular outcomes, but delayed the onset of albuminuria and some measures of eye complications and neuropathy. Seven secondary measures at study end favoured intensive therapy (p<0.05). INTERPRETATION: Microvascular benefits of intensive therapy should be weighed against the increase in total and cardiovascular disease-related mortality, increased weight gain, and high risk for severe hypoglycaemia. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Institute on Aging; National Eye Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and General Clinical Research Centers.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Indexed MeSH termsAdultAgedBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesDiabetic NephropathiesDiabetic NeuropathiesDiabetic RetinopathyGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLipids

Resumen

Hyperglycaemia is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este amplio ensayo controlado aleatorizado multicéntrico (ACCORD) examinó si el control glucémico intensivo (objetivo de HbA1c <6,0%) frente al tratamiento estándar (7,0–7,9%) reducía las complicaciones microvasculares en 10.251 pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y factores de riesgo cardiovascular. El tratamiento intensivo se interrumpió precozmente debido a una mayor mortalidad, y aunque retrasó algunas medidas microvasculares secundarias (albuminuria, ciertas complicaciones oculares y neuropatía), no redujo significativamente los desenlaces microvasculares compuestos avanzados. Este estudio no tiene relevancia directa ni indirecta para la hirudoterapia, el secretoma de la sanguijuela ni los terapéuticos derivados de la sanguijuela; se refiere a estrategias farmacológicas de reducción de la glucosa y desenlaces de la diabetes, sin mención de sanguijuelas ni intervenciones relacionadas.

Citación

Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial

Ismail-Beigi F et al. · Lancet (London, England), 2010

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.