Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Treatment options for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Research article published in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (2003)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Research reportEnsayos clínicosDesarrollo de fármacosGreinacher · American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2003

Abstract

Appropriate management, as well as efficacy and safety, of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and prevention of severe consequences with argatroban and lepirudin are discussed. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a serious immune-mediated drug reaction, can occur as an isolated incident (isolated HIT) or with acute thrombosis sometimes referred to as HIT and associated thrombosis syndrome (HITTS). Due to the severe consequences associated with HIT, appropriate management is critical. Argatroban and lepirudin, two direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), are currently FDA approved for use in patients with HIT. The clinical experience with these agents is critically examined in this article. The safety and efficacy of argatroban in management of HIT were the subject of a single published clinical trial. The study was designed to reflect conventional clinical practice, whereby treatment of patients with HIT was initiated upon clinical suspicion. In several of these patients, HIT antibodies could not be demonstrated. Compared to historical controls, argatroban demonstrated efficacy in patients with isolated HIT; however, no differences were observed in HIT patients with acute thrombosis. Rates of bleeding episodes did not differ between argatroban and control. The clinical efficacy and safety of lepirudin have been the subject of three clinical trials and one large drug monitoring program. Lepirudin has demonstrated benefit in HIT patients with or without existing thromboembolism. Bleeding rates were higher than in the historical control. However, bleedings requiring transfusion did not differ. Although no direct head-to-head comparison trials of argatroban and lepirudin have been conducted, parallels can be drawn between the agents based on careful review of published clinical trials. Consistently, rates of new thrombosis, limb amputation, and death appear to be lower in patients treated with lepirudin as compared with those treated with argatroban, whereas the risk for major bleeding per patient day seems to be similar with both DTIs.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAntithrombinsArginineHeparinHirudinsHumansPipecolic AcidsRecombinant ProteinsSulfonamidesThrombocytopeniaThrombosisUnited States

Resumen

Appropriate management, as well as efficacy and safety, of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and prevention of severe consequences with argatroban and lepirudin are discussed. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a serious immune-mediated drug reaction, can occur as an isolated incident (isolated...

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Este artículo examina críticamente la eficacia y la seguridad de argatrobán y lepirudina —ambos inhibidores directos de la trombina aprobados por la FDA para la trombocitopenia inducida por heparina (TIH)—, basándose en ensayos clínicos publicados y en un programa de monitorización farmacológica. La lepirudina, descrita como aquella que demostró beneficio en pacientes con TIH con o sin tromboembolismo preexistente, es un producto de hirudina recombinante, lo que hace este trabajo directamente relevante para el dominio de ASH. La revisión sugiere que la lepirudina podría mostrar tasas más bajas de nueva trombosis, amputación de la extremidad y muerte en comparación con argatrobán, aunque las tasas de hemorragia que requirieron transfusión no difirieron significativamente. La advertencia honesta es que no se realizaron ensayos comparativos directos cara a cara, que estas observaciones derivan de comparaciones indirectas entre estudios con diseños diferentes, y que el artículo concierne al producto farmacéutico recombinante más que a la terapia con sanguijuelas vivas o al secretoma crudo de sanguijuela.

Citación

Treatment options for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Greinacher · American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2003

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.