Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Global Variations in Surgical Techniques and Postoperative Care for Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF) in Head & Neck Surgery: A Cross-Sectional International Survey

Research article published in Journal of clinical medicine (2025)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportEnsayos clínicosRusso et al. · Journal of clinical medicine, 2025

Abstract

Objective: This cross-sectional survey aimed to comprehensively gather data on radial forearm free flap (RFFF) utilization and practices in head and neck reconstructive surgery. Methods: An online questionnaire was organized into seven sections: demographics, surgeon experience, harvesting techniques, microsurgical considerations, postoperative care, flap monitoring, and outcomes. It was distributed by email to 216 head and neck reconstructive surgeons who attended the International Federation of Head and Neck Oncologic Societies (IFHNOS) congress in Rome (21-25 June 2023) using the congress mailing list. Responses were collected from 54 surgeons (25% response rate), representing 15 countries across Europe, Asia, the Americas, and Oceania, underscoring the international scope of the survey between 5 February and 25 March 2024. The questionnaire was not formally piloted or validated. Missing data were managed on a per-question basis. Descriptive statistics were used, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for key surgical outcomes to indicate estimate precision. Associations between categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 test with Cramér's V as an effect size, and relationships between continuous variables were examined using Spearman's rank correlation (ρ) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Given the exploratory design and limited sample size, no correction for multiple comparisons was applied, and the risk of both Type I and Type II errors was acknowledged. Results: Variations were observed in harvesting techniques, microsurgical preferences, and postoperative care protocols. Most surgeons initiated flap harvesting concurrently with tumor resection, primarily preserving superficial sensory nerves. Regarding venous outflow, 50% of respondents preferred the cephalic vein, 19% used comitant veins, and 29% utilized both systems when possible. Perioperative antibiotic use was standard practice, though anticoagulant preferences and flap monitoring methods varied. The study achieved a high success rate for RFFF procedures, exceeding 95%, with venous thrombosis identified as the main cause of flap failure. No significant correlations were found between flap failure rate and training method (p = 0.21), specialty (p = 0.37), annual number of RFFF procedures (p = 0.89), surgeon age (p = 0.42), or hospital type (p = 0.48). Effect sizes were small to moderate, indicating weak or negligible associations. Similarly, perioperative factors such as anticoagulant use (p = 0.84), preoperative antibiotics (p = 0.42), surgical instruments (p = 0.61), suture techniques (p = 0.51), and donor vein selection (p = 0.20) showed no statistically significant associations with flap loss. Patient satisfaction assessments were inconsistent, with only 39% of surgeons routinely performing them. Conclusions: The study provides valuable insights into current RFFF practices and outcomes across an international cohort of head and neck surgeons, highlighting patterns and variability in techniques, perioperative care, and monitoring strategies.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Resumen

Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Esta encuesta transversal internacional de 54 cirujanos reconstructores de cabeza y cuello (tasa de respuesta del 25%, 15 países) documentó una amplia variación en la técnica de colgajo libre de antebrazo radial, la práctica microquirúrgica y posoperatoria, reportando una tasa global de éxito del RFFF superior al 95% e identificando la trombosis venosa como la causa principal del fallo del colgajo, sin encontrarse una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre la pérdida del colgajo y el uso de anticoagulantes u otros factores perioperatorios. Esto constituye un contexto significativo para la hirudoterapia, ya que las sanguijuelas medicinales se utilizan con mayor frecuencia para rescatar colgajos libres que sufren congestión venosa, y la encuesta confirma que la trombosis venosa sigue siendo la principal amenaza para la supervivencia del colgajo, mientras también muestra que la práctica de la anticoagulación es altamente no estandarizada. Al ser una encuesta no pilotada, no validada, con una muestra pequeña y auto-seleccionada y sin variable de terapia con sanguijuelas, describe patrones de práctica en lugar de probar cualquier intervención, por lo que sus hallazgos no significativos sobre la anticoagulación no pueden tomarse como evidencia a favor o en contra del uso adjunto de sanguijuelas.

Citación

Global Variations in Surgical Techniques and Postoperative Care for Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF) in Head & Neck Surgery: A Cross-Sectional International Survey.

Russo et al. · Journal of clinical medicine, 2025

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.